Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Kem Search, Inc. v. Sheffield, 434 So. 2d 1067.

323 citing documents.

Barlow v. Barlow 87 So. 3d 386 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Yellowbird Investments, L.L.C. v. Barber 87 So. 3d 970 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Jolin, Inc., 2001-0149 (La.10/16/01), ; Kem Search, Payne v. Glass, 41,232 (La.App.2d Cir.8/23/06), .
Midland Funding LLC v. Kelly 81 So. 3d 84 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
IEW [1,2] The Louisiana Supreme Court has recognized that “[i]n reviewing a decision of the trial court on a petition for nullity, the issue for the reviewing court is not whether the trial court was right or wrong but whether the trial court’s conclusions were reasonable.” Belle Pass Terminal, Inc. v. Jolin, Inc., 2001-0149, p. 5 (La.10/16/01), ().
A.M.E. Disaster Recovery Services, Inc. v. City of New Orleans 72 So. 3d 454 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Kem Search, -72 (La.1983).
Tommy McCain v. Joanna Cassidy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
to determine whether a particular judgment has been obtained by fraud or ill practices are: “(1) when the circumstances under which the judgment was rendered show the deprivation of legal rights of the litigant who seeks relief, and (2) when the enforcement of the judgment would be 4 unconscionable and inequitable.” Kem Search
McCain v. Cassidy 68 So. 3d 631 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
The criteria used to determine whether a particular judgment has been obtained by fraud or ill practices are: “(1) when the circumstances under which the judgment was rendered show the deprivation of legal rights of the litigant who seeks relief, and (2) when the enforcement of the judgment would be |sunconscionable and inequitable.” Kem Search
Pollock v. TALCO MIDSTREAM ASSETS, LTD. 70 So. 3d 835 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
See, e.g. Power Marketing Direct Inc. v. Foster, 2005-2023 (La.9/6/06), ; Russell v. Illinois Central Gulf R., 96-2649 (La.1/10/97)
Adcock v. Ewing 57 So. 3d 434 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Power Marketing Direct, Inc. v. Foster, 2005-2023 (La.09/06/06), ; Kem Search
Cadle Co. v. Henson 57 So. 3d 458 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Kem Search, Power Marketing Direct, Inc. v. Foster, 05-2023 (La.9/6/06), ; Belle Pass Terminal, Inc. v. Jolin, Inc., 01-0149 (La.10/16/01), ; Campbell v. Select Car Co., 38,443 (La.App.2d Cir. 5/12/04), , writ denied, 04-1747 (La.10/15/04), .
Lowe's Home Construction, LLC v. Lips 61 So. 3d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir.1991), citing Kem Search
Jcp Investments, LLC v. Mable Lee Thomas Champ La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
See Kem Search, Clulee v. Louisiana Materials Co., Inc., (La.App.
Duckworth Properties, L.L.C. v. Williams 52 So. 3d 287 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
Succession of Hal Dempsy Gaston v. Stephanie Koontz La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
SUCCESSION OF GASTON v. Koontz 49 So. 3d 1054 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Jones v. LSU/EA CONWAY MEDICAL CENTER 46 So. 3d 205 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Allerton v. Broussard 47 So. 3d 493 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Kem Search, -72 (La.1983).
Succession of Simon Harrell and Clara Harrell v. Erris-Omega Plantation, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
The criteria used to determine whether a particular judgment has been obtained by fraud or ill practices are: “(1) when the circumstances under which the judgment was rendered show the deprivation of legal rights of the litigant who seeks relief, and (2) when the enforcement of the judgment would be unconscionable and inequitable.” Kem Search, 1070 (La.1983); see also, Wright
Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. v. Louis Michael Todd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 11/2/06), writ denied, 06-2823 (La.1/26/07), Kem Search
Succession of Harrell v. Erris-Omega Plantation, Inc. 41 So. 3d 1215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
The criteria used to determine whether a particular judgment has been obtained by fraud or ill practices are: “(1) when the circumstances under which the judgment was rendered show the deprivation of legal rights of the litigant who seeks relief, and (2) when the enforcement of the judgment would be unconscionable and inequitable.” Kern Search, 70 (La.1983); see also, Wright, .
James Patrick Cluse D/B/A J. P. Cluse Construction v. H & E Equipment Services, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Cluse v. H & E Equipment Services, Inc. 34 So. 3d 959 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
ORX Resources, Inc. v. MBW Exploration, L.L.C. 32 So. 3d 931 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
4 Cir. 1/24/07) , (citing Kem Search, )).
Prejean v. Guillory 28 So. 3d 1174 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Guillory v. Hebert 31 So. 3d 1097 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Kem Search, -1072 (La.1983); Ponthier, supra.
Kathy Prejean v. Walter Guillory La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Hymel v. Discover Bank 30 So. 3d 51 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Kem Search, Wright v. La.
Pollock v. TALCO MIDSTREAM ASSETS, LTD. 22 So. 3d 1033 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
In Kem Search, our supreme court addressed a similar default judgment situation involving the exchange of communications between the plaintiffs counsel and the defendant before the defendant had answered the suit or otherwise made an appearance in the case.
Succession of Kathryn Lambert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Westcott v. Westcott 11 So. 3d 45 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Kevin Associates, L.L.C. v. Crawford, 03-0211, p. 15 (La.1/30/04) 865 So.2d11 34, 44, citing Kem Search
Hixon Autoplex of Alexandria, Inc. v. Donald Ray Lewis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
HIXSON AUTOPLEX OF ALEXANDRIA, INC. v. Lewis 6 So. 3d 423 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Asi Management, LLC v. Advantage Ford, Inc. 999 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
In support, Ford relies in part on Kem Search
Johnson v. Cain 999 So. 2d 51 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Mike v. Bob's Painting 995 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Filson v. Windsor Court Hotel 990 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 1/24/07) , ( citing Kem Search, ).
SAFETY NAT. CAS. CORP. v. State 986 So. 2d 802 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
Morehead, supra, citing Kem Search
Duplechian v. Sba Network Services, Inc. 980 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Our supreme court, in Kem Search, -72 , stated the following: It is well settled that reviewing courts will defer to a trial judge's reasonable decision on a question or matter properly within his discretion.
In the Interest of Hardy Ray Krantz La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
In the Interest of H.R.K. 980 So. 2d 200 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Louis. Dep. of Env. Qual. v. Tangilena Vil. 978 So. 2d 1028 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Kem Search, -72 (La.1983).
Minton v. LONG'S PREFERRED PRODUCTS, INC. 977 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
( quoting Kem Search, and Belle Pass, 800 So.2d at 767 )(alteration in original)).
Linda K. Minton v. Long's Preferred Products, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
(quoting Kem Search, and Belle Pass, 800 So.2d at 767)(alteration in original)).
McLean v. DAVIE SHORING, INC. 976 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Kem Search, -1072 (La.1983).
Kelda Wells v. Melvin Price La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Marian Bowman v. Gary Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir.), writ denied, wherein this court reasoned as follows: It is well established that a default judgment will be set aside if it was obtained by “fraud or ill practices.” Kem Search
Bowman v. Smith 971 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
3 Cir.), writ denied, wherein this court reasoned as follows: It is well established that a default judgment will be set aside if it was obtained by “fraud or ill practices.” Kem Search
Johnson v. UNOPENED SUCCESSION 969 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Herff Jones, Inc. v. Girouard 966 So. 2d 1127 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 11/2/06) , , writ denied, 06-2823 (La.1/26/07), ; Kem Search
Herff Jones, Inc. v. Nettie Sue Girouard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Miremont v. Miremont 962 So. 2d 512 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007