Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lamb v. Lamb, 430 So. 2d 51.

101 citing documents.

Williams v. WO MOSS REGIONAL MED. CENTER 903 So. 2d 1150 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Evangelista v. U.S. Welding Service, Inc. 898 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Peters v. Hortman 897 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Taxing Dist. v. ALL TAXPAYERS, PROP. OWNERS 883 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
the Supreme Court explained that a proper application of La.Code Civ.
Campbell v. Tork, Inc. 870 So. 2d 968 La. 2004
Mossy Motors, Inc. v. Cameras America 851 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
Melder v. Paul 831 So. 2d 1070 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Furthermore, this court has held that “when the trial judge is convinced by his examination of the facts that the judgment would result in a miscarriage of justice, a new trial should be ordered.”
Connor v. Scroggs 821 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Crump v. Bank One Corp., 35,990 (La.App.2d Cir.05/08/02), , citing, (La.
Crump v. Bank One Corp. 817 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Bordelon v. Sayer 811 So. 2d 1232 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
The supreme court, noted: the general policy consideration ...
Stett v. Greve 810 So. 2d 1203 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Bates v. Legion Indem. Co. 818 So. 2d 176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Hebert v. CF Bean Corp. 785 So. 2d 1029 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 774 So. 2d 84 La. 2000
Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc. 772 So. 2d 94 La. 2000
Hickman v. Wm. Wrigley, Jr. Co., Inc. 768 So. 2d 812 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Waters v. Allstate Insurance Co. 731 So. 2d 1001 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Anderson v. Anderson 732 So. 2d 537 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
Bankston v. Bankston 722 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Washington v. GRAND CASINOS OF LA., INC. 715 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Carter v. Patterson Ins. Co. 675 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
May v. Jones 675 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
471 , (1960); Perkins v. K-Mart Corp., 94-2065 (La.App.
STATE DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. v. Scramuzza 673 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Antley v. Brantly 669 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Cashback, Inc. v. Herring 669 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Carroll v. Coleman 666 So. 2d 1264 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Bannister v. Dept. of Streets 666 So. 2d 641 La. 1996
Berry v. Frank, 93-1163 (La.App.
Carpenter v. Hannan 663 So. 2d 725 La. 1995
Drury v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. 659 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
art. 1973 as follows: "A proper application of this article necessitates an examination of the facts and circumstances of the individual case.
Calhoun v. Deslattes 648 So. 2d 993 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Oswalt v. STATE, DOTD 640 So. 2d 388 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Commenting on Art. 1973 the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: *392 "A proper application of this article necessitates an examination of the facts and circumstances of the individual case.
Anthony v. Davis Lumber 629 So. 2d 329 La. 1993
art. 1973 as follows: A proper application of this article necessitates an examination of the facts and circumstances of the individual case.
Joseph v. Joseph 619 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Thibodeau v. Mayor and Councilmen of Morgan City 619 So. 2d 595 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Distinguished WEST CONSOL. CO., INC. v. Creole Fisheries 616 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Mrs. Lamb had been attempting to litigate her case through her attorney.
Meshell v. Russell 589 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Harold v. Bouchat 588 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
by the court on its own motion, to all or any of the parties and on all or part of the issues, or for reargument only.” (La.
Garrett v. Universal Underwriters 586 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
Tudela v. Broussard 581 So. 2d 1068 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
Laprarie v. King 575 So. 2d 921 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Taylor v. Dowden 563 So. 2d 1294 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
3 Cir.1982), reversed on other grounds, Brown v. Trinity Ins.
Hollier v. Lay Down Service, Inc. 554 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated at page 53: “La.C.C.P.
Draper v. Draper 554 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Thompson v. State ex rel. Department of Labor, Office of Employment Security 544 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Thibodeaux v. Burton 538 So. 2d 1001 La. 1989
Romero v. Romero 512 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Elliott v. Kennedy 493 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Gulf Federal Savings Bank v. Robert 474 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
did so, noting “the general policy consideration ...
Roderfeld v. Willmoth 473 So. 2d 349 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Hampton v. Rubicon Chemicals, Inc. 458 So. 2d 1260 La. 1984