DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite PPG Industries, Inc. v. Bean Dredging, 447 So. 2d 1058.

64 citing documents.

  • Cedarholley Investment, LLC v. Pitre 209 So. 3d 850 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • England v. Fifth Louisiana Levee District 167 So. 3d 1105 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    Paul places emphasis on the Louisiana Supreme Court ruling in PPG Industries, for its legal cause argument.
  • Maw Enterprises, L.L.C. v. City of Marksville 149 So. 3d 210 La. 2014
    3 Cir. 7/12/06) , , writ denied, 06-2301 (La.12/8/06), ; PPG Industries, and Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. Flint, 275 U.S. 303 , 48 S.Ct.
  • Maw Enterprises, L.L.C. v. City of Marksville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    Pointing to Louisiana Crawfish, PPG Industries, and Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. Flint, 275 U.S. 303, 48 S.Ct.
  • MAW Enterprises L.L.C. v. City of Marksville 128 So. 3d 575 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Pointing to Louisiana Crawfish, , PPG Industries, and Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. Flint, 275 U.S. 303 , 48 S.Ct.
  • Bloxom v. City of Shreveport 103 So. 3d 383 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    The requirement of legal cause prevents the imposition of liability “in an indeterminate amount for an indeterminate time to an indeterminate class.” and citations therein.
  • Patrick E. Phillips v. G & H Seed Company, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    3 290 (1927), in favor of the policy driven duty/risk analysis espoused in PPG Industries
  • Phillips v. G & H Seed Co. 86 So. 3d 773 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • Carpenter v. Foremost Signature Insurance 87 So. 3d 264 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    The requirement of legal cause prevents the imposition of liability “in an indeterminate amount for an indeterminate time to an indeterminate class.” (1984), 1061, and citations therein.
  • Eagle Pipe and Supply, Inc. v. Amerada Hess Corporation 79 So. 3d 246 La. 2011
  • Patrick E. Phillips, Jr. v. G & H Seed Company, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    134 (1927), in favor of the policy driven duty/risk analysis espoused in PPG Industries
  • Phillips v. G & H SEED CO. 68 So. 3d 645 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    290 (1927), in favor of the policy driven duty/risk analysis espoused in PPG Industries
  • Patrick E. Phillips v. G & H Seed Company, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    134 (1927), in favor of the policy driven duty/risk analysis -2- espoused in PPG Industries
  • Phillips v. G & H SEED CO. 66 So. 3d 507 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    290 (1927), in favor of the policy driven duty/risk analysis | sespoused in PPG Industries
  • B. Samuel Co. v. Xavier University of Louisiana 57 So. 3d 559 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    In PPG Industries, Inc. v. Bean Dredging, Inc., the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that we should consider “the moral, social and economic values involved, ...
  • Vicky Bates v. Alexandria Mall, I, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    3 Cir.), writ granted, aff’d, ).
  • Bates v. ALEXANDRIA MALL I, LLC 20 So. 3d 1207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    3 Cir.), writ granted, aff'd, ).
  • Patrick E. Phillips, Jr. v. G & H Seed Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    The supreme court discussed the issue of recovery of economic damages in a supply chain system in PPG Industries
  • Phillips v. G & H Seed Co., Inc. 10 So. 3d 339 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    The supreme court discussed the issue of recovery of economic damages in a supply chain system in PPG Industries
  • Mary Cutsinger v. Laura Redfern La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir.), writ granted, aff’d, ).
  • Cutsinger v. Redfern 997 So. 2d 585 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir.), writ granted, aff'd, ).
  • Anthony Crane Rental, LP v. Fruge 833 So. 2d 1070 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    3 Cir.), writ granted, affirmed
  • Cleco Corp. v. Johnson 795 So. 2d 302 La. 2001
    Professional Answering Service relied heavily on this court's decision in PPG Industries, which involved a situation where the defendant's dredging operations damaged a gas pipeline owned by Texaco.
  • Louisiana Swabbing Ser. v. Enterprise Prod. Company 784 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    The method for analyzing whether a particular risk falls within the scope of duty element is set forth in PPG Indus., as follows: Rules of conduct are designed to protect some persons under some circumstances against some risks.
  • CAJUN CONCRETE SERV. INC. v. Lemoine Co., Inc. 791 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    However, the circumstances must meet the tests set forth in PPG Industries, and in Professional Answering Service, Inc. v. Central Louisiana Electric Company, Inc., (La.App.
  • CLECO CORP. v. Johnson 775 So. 2d 1228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    In affirming that decision, this court observed that the jurisprudence in this state is clear that there is no cause of action for negligent interference with contractual relations resulting in physical damage and economic loss, citing PPG Industries, (La.
  • Clavier v. Lay Down Service, Inc. 776 So. 2d 634 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    3 Cir.), writ granted, affirmed
  • Harp v. PINE BLUFF AND SAND GRAVEL CO. 750 So. 2d 226 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    (2) The court erred in refusing to follow PPG Industries, Inc. v. Bean Dredging, Inc., and by refusing to hold that these plaintiffs have no cause of action under state or maritime law for purely economic losses.
  • Trahan v. McManus 728 So. 2d 1273 La. 1999
    See, e.g., PPG Industries v. Bean Dredging, Inc., in which this court held that the liability of a dredging contractor who negligently damaged a natural gas pipeline does not extend to the economic losses incurred by the pipeline owner's contract customer who was required to obtain gas at a higher price from another source during the period of repair of th
  • Crockett v. Cardona 713 So. 2d 802 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    PPG Industries, n. 1 (La.1984).
  • Trahan v. McManus 653 So. 2d 89 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
    (La.1990), citing PPG Industries, Hill v. Lundin and Associates, Inc., 260 La.
  • Durand v. McGaw 635 So. 2d 409 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
  • Domingue v. Reliance Ins. Co. 619 So. 2d 1220 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
  • Roberts v. Benoit 605 So. 2d 1032 La. 1992
    This Court denied recovery a few years later in PPG Industries, in which the plaintiff sought to recover its indirect economic losses from the tortfeasor who damaged a third party's pipeline.
  • State v. Loyden 597 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
  • Lewis v. Aluminum Co. of America 588 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
    9 to 5 Fashions, Inc. v. Spurney, supra ; PPG Industries, (La.App.
  • Larsen v. Renard 576 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • Mahfouz v. Old Republic Insurance Co. 570 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    They argued at the trial court level, and continue to argue here, that the claim for damages as a result of the recordation of the judgment and its operation as a judicial mortgage is a cause of action for negligent interference with contractual relations, as to which Louisiana recognizes no cause of action, citing PPG Industries, (La.
  • Herbert v. Placid Refining Co. 564 So. 2d 371 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    9 to 5 Fashions, PPG Industries, Professional Answering Service, Inc. v. Central Louisiana Electric Company, Inc., (La.App.
  • Lejeune v. Rayne Branch Hosp. 556 So. 2d 559 La. 1990
    PPG Industries, Crowe, supra, at 906.
  • McManus v. Barber Bros. Contracting Co. 552 So. 2d 1017 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    1974); Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
  • W.B. McCartney Oil Co. v. Hataway 544 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    In PPG Industries, the Supreme Court expanded upon its reasoning in Hill as follows: ‘...
  • Tallo v. Stroh Brewery Co. 544 So. 2d 452 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
    See, Sanborn v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc., PPG Industries
  • King v. Louviere 543 So. 2d 1327 La. 1989
    1988); PPG Industries, Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., 260 La.
  • 9 to 5 Fashions, Inc. v. Spurney 538 So. 2d 228 La. 1989
    E.g., PPG Industries, (abrogating the rule that flatly prohibited recovery for intangible economic loss produced by negligent conduct); see also, Sanborn v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc., (suggesting that intentional tortious interference with contract rights may be actionable); Robertson, supra.
  • Pitre v. Opelousas General Hosp. 530 So. 2d 1151 La. 1988
    See, e.g., PPG Industries, Hill v. Lundin and Assoc., Inc., 260 La.
  • Pro. Answering Serv. v. Cent. La. Elec. 521 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    PPG Industries, Forcum-James Co. v. Duke Transportation Co., 231 La.
  • Professional Answering Service, Inc. v. Central Louisiana Electric Co. 521 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    PPG Industries, Forcum-James Co. v. Duke Transportation Co., 231 La.
  • Pitre v. Opelousas General Hosp. 517 So. 2d 1019 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • Lagarde v. Allstate Ins. Co. 515 So. 2d 1147 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
    Lagarde cites Sanborn v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc., and PPG Industries, as authority for the recognition of this tort.