DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Chaney v. State Through Dept. of Health, 432 So. 2d 256.

65 citing documents.

  • Welch v. St. Francis Medical Center, Inc. 521 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    The Supreme Court had earlier explained in Chaney v. State, Through Department of Health, that LSA-R.S.
  • Minor v. Casten 521 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
    the Supreme Court held that R.S.
  • Gover v. Bridges 497 So. 2d 1364 La. 1986
    In Chaney v. State Department of Health & Human Resources, this court held that R.S.
  • Billedeau v. Prather 493 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    Ramirez was decided May 2, 1983, and on May 23, 1983
  • Gover v. Bridges 486 So. 2d 1117 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    the doctrine of contra non valentem as applied to LSA-R.S.
  • Marcel v. La. State Dept. of Public Health 492 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • Maltby v. Gauthier 489 So. 2d 396 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    where the cause of action is not known or reasonably knowable by the plaintiff, even though his ignorance is not induced by the defendant_” at 259.
  • Crier v. Whitecloud 486 So. 2d 713 La. 1986
    This court in Chaney v. State, Department of Health and Human Resources, recognized that La.
  • Hebert v. Doctors Memorial Hosp. 486 So. 2d 717 La. 1986
  • Kubnick v. Sorum 483 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    However, the Supreme Court held that the legislature, by enacting R.S.
  • Gurdin v. Dongieux 468 So. 2d 1241 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • McBride v. Earl K. Long Memorial Hospital 459 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    There are only two Supreme Court cases addressing the narrow issue now before us. Lott v. Haley
  • Gunter v. Plauche 439 So. 2d 437 La. 1983
  • Distinguished Harvey v. Davis 432 So. 2d 1203 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
    We distinguish Chaney v. State, through Dept. of Health, , recently decided by the Supreme Court on May 23, 1983.
  • Chalstrom v. Desselles on Behalf of Desselles 433 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
    9:5628 would defeat any action, notwithstanding that the malpractice was neither known nor reasonably knowable by the patient prior to the three-year limit and that the patient might under prior law have invoked the doctrine that prescription does not run against one unable to act; Chaney v. State of La., DHHR