Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Diaz v. Allstate Ins. Co., 433 So. 2d 699.
-
Ronald Bodenheimer v. The State of Louisiana, The Honorable Jeff Landry, in His Capacity as the Louisiana Attorney …
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
6/ 3/ 83), determined that district attorney employees are [ employees] 03 of the state for the purposes of then La.
-
Ocean Jasmine Manning v. State of Louisiana
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
10/15/96), “that state prosecuting attorneys are constitutional officers who serve in the judicial branch of the government.” In Foster v. Powdrill, 463 (La.App.
-
Orleans Parish School Board v. Quatrevaux
154 So. 3d 612
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Diaz v. Allstate Insurance, Co., (La.
-
Louisiana State Board of Nursing v. Gautreaux
39 So. 3d 806
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Board of Commissioners of Orleans Levee *815 District v. Connick, 94-3161 (La.3/9/95), ( ).
- Sinclair v. State, Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections 769 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
-
Knapper v. Connick
681 So. 2d 944
La. 1996
we held that state prosecuting attorneys are constitutional officers who serve in the judicial branch of the government.
- West v. Foti 654 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
-
BD. OF COM'RS OF ORLEANS LEVEE DISTRICT v. Connick
654 So. 2d 1073
La. 1995
("a court should not pass on the constitutionality of legislation unless it is essential to the decision of a case or controversy").
- In Re Pitre 630 So. 2d 700 La. 1994
- D'Amico v. City of Baton Rouge 620 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
-
Shepherd v. City of Baton Rouge
588 So. 2d 1210
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
the court held that a statute which provided indemnification by the state to various public officers and employees for damages to third partiesLSA-R.S.
- State v. Alpaugh 568 So. 2d 1379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
-
Donnell v. City of New Orleans
557 So. 2d 278
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Co., the Supreme Court held that the District Attorney and his employees were entitled to indemnification under the statute as persons “holding office or employment in one of the branches of state government.” Assuming arguendo that the 1984 amendment excludes district attorneys and their employees from indemnif
- Diaz v. Allstate Insurance Co. 480 So. 2d 995 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
- Foster v. Powdrill 463 So. 2d 891 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985