Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Narcise v. Illinois Cent. R. Co., 427 So. 2d 1192.

65 citing documents.

Christopher Blanchard v. Demetrius J. Hicks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Co., Huguet v. Louisiana Power & Light Co., 196 La.
Blanchard v. Hicks 244 So. 3d 875 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Co., ; Huguet v. Louisiana Power & Light Co., 196 La.
Roland Robin v. Russell Hebert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Robin v. Hebert 157 So. 3d 63 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Walton v. Burns 151 So. 3d 616 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Distinguished Glasgow v. PAR MINERALS CORP. 70 So. 3d 765 La. 2011
bility, that determines the | nsolidarity of the obligation.’ Thus, to the extent that the worker’s compensation death benefits and the wrongful death and survival provisions overlap, [the employer] and [alleged tortfeasor] are obligated to the same thing even though the obligations arise from different sources.” Williams, 611 So.2d at 1388
Bonnie Romero v. Clarendon America Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Romero v. CLARENDON AMERICA INS. CO. 54 So. 3d 789 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
R. Co., ] control the question of whether a co-defendant found liable for general damages may be summoned simply on account of its co-defendant status to bear the responsibility of another condemned to pay exemplary damages.
Cutsinger v. Redfern 12 So. 3d 945 La. 2009
Similarly, we used these standards to find the existence of solidary liability between a railroad company liable to its employee under the Federal Employer’s Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.
Ferguson v. Sugar 988 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Bellard v. American Cent. Ins. Co. 980 So. 2d 654 La. 2008
we conducted a similar analysis to find solidary liability between a railroad company liable to its employee under the Federal Employer's Liability Act ("FELA"), 45 U.S.C.
Evans v. Smith 945 So. 2d 184 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
The supreme court also acknowledged its earlier opinion, which held that there can be solidary liability between a third-party tort-feasor and an employer sued under the Federal Employers' Liability Act.
Roy E. Evans v. Derrick D. Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
The supreme court also acknowledged its earlier opinion, which held that there can be solidary liability between a third-party tort- 2 feasor and an employer sued under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act.
Vicknair v. St. James Parish School Bd. 907 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
Omsi v. Alvin Joe Elliott La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
R. Co., -95 (La.1983)(footnote omitted).
OMSI v. Elliott 869 So. 2d 300 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Gulf R. Co., -95 (La.1983)(footnote omitted).
Hernandez v. Chalmette Medical Center 869 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
Berlier v. AP Green Industries, Inc. 815 So. 2d 39 La. 2002
Dumas v. State 804 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Weber, supra at 1051 , (La.
Gardes Directional Drilling, Inc. v. Bennett 787 So. 2d 1201 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Co., see also American Grain Ass’n. v. Canfield, Burch & Mancuso, (La.App.
Kyser v. Metro Ambulance, Inc. 764 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Lucero v. Burney Gear Co. 764 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Following significant rulings of the Louisiana Supreme Court, new Article 1797 was added to the Civil Code in the revision of 1984 recognizing that the obligations of the obligors may arise from different sources yet solidarity of the obligation to the obli-gee nevertheless can exist.
Thompson v. Harrington 746 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Co., see also American Grain Ass'n.
Charleston v. Berry 723 So. 2d 1069 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Ballam v. Seibels Bruce Ins. Co. 712 So. 2d 543 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
-95 (La.1983) (citing Hoefly ); Molony v. United Services Automobile Association, 96-1747 (La.App.
Petroleum Rental Tools, Inc. v. Hal Oil & Gas Co. 701 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Molony v. United Services Auto. Ass'n 683 So. 2d 891 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
1982) and between an employer and a
James v. Formosa Plastics Corp. of La. 672 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Co., Hoefly, 418 So.2d at 579 .
Rizer v. American Sur. & Fid. Ins. Co. 669 So. 2d 387 La. 1996
Central Gulf Railroad, this court found that a railroad company liable to its employee under the Federal Employer's Liability Act was solidarily liable with a third party tortfeasor.
Sanders v. Zeagler 670 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Galloway v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEVE. 654 So. 2d 1345 La. 1995
Stonecipher v. Mitchell 655 So. 2d 1381 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Vedros v. Public Grain Elevator of N.O., Inc. 654 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
JSOLIDARY LIABILITY: In Narcise v. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad, Co., our Supreme Court stated: “The fact of different defenses, different prescriptive periods, different beneficiaries in some cases, and different elements of damages does not detract from the in soli-do nature of the obligation of the two debtors.
Farm Credit Bank of Texas v. Bassett 653 So. 2d 206 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Bourque v. Bailey 643 So. 2d 236 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Steptoe v. Lallie Kemp Hosp. 634 So. 2d 331 La. 1994
Steptoe v. Lallie Kemp Regional Hospital 618 So. 2d 1008 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Touchard v. Williams 617 So. 2d 885 La. 1993
Co., Huguet v. Louisiana Power & Light Co., 196 La.
Yarbrough v. Federal Land Bank Ass'n of Jackson 616 So. 2d 1327 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Williams v. Sewerage & Water Bd. of NO 611 So. 2d 1383 La. 1993
the trial judge found that prescription was interrupted as to Little Giant once the Williamses filed suit against the S & WB seeking worker's compensation.
Williams v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans 597 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
*590 PRESCRIPTION: The trial court overruled defendant’s exception of prescription based on the legal principle that prescription is interrupted as to a third-party tortfeasor when a timely suit is filed against the employer for worker’s compensation, citing Narcise v. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad Company, et al
Nicholson & Loup v. Carl E. Woodward 596 So. 2d 374 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Keith v. Comco Insurance Co. 574 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Keith v. Comco Ins. Co. 574 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Pickard v. Baugh 565 So. 2d 1102 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
this court held that two defendants may be solidarily liable for those damages for which plaintiff can compel either to pay, even though other elements of damages may be recoverable only against one of the defendants.
Great SW Fire Ins. Co. v. CNA Ins. Companies 557 So. 2d 966 La. 1990
Co., Hoefly v. Government Employees Ins.
Burke v. Safeway Stores, Inc. 554 So. 2d 184 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
cited in Dusenbery , the court noted that the legislative adoption of a comparative fault system which requires the fault of all parties to be quantified, possibly will do away to a large extent with the necessity of distinguishing between contribution and indemnity among solidary tort obligors.
Crockett v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc. 538 So. 2d 1133 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
as authority for the proposition in solido liability exists between Avondale and Penrod Drilling.
Stelly v. Patterson Services, Inc. 539 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Color Connection, Inc. v. Juneau 505 So. 2d 914 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Co., Frank’s Door & Bldg.