DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Williams, 421 So. 2d 874.

110 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. K.B. La. 2025
    This Court, too, has made clear that “officers may not stop or forcibly detain a person or approach citizens ‘under circumstances that make it seem that some form of detention is imminent unless they have probable cause to arrest the individual or reasonable grounds to detain the individual.’” (La.
  • State v. Ansah 147 So. 3d 248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    State v. Britton, 1993-1990, p. 2 (La.1/27/94), *253 ( ).
  • State v. Hall 134 So. 3d 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    744 , 151 L.Ed.2d 740 (2002); (to determine whether a reasonable, articulable suspicion existed, the court must weigh all of the circumstances known to the police at the time the stop was made).
  • State v. Duhe 130 So. 3d 880 La. 2013
    673, 676 , 145 L.Ed.2d 570 (2000) (high crime area and subjective expectations of police plus startled look and “unprovoked flight” supports a Terry stop); (“[Gjiven the sudden departure of the trio at the approach of the police, given the furtive gesture of one of them and the coincident attempt at departure by defendant in his vehicle, the officers’ hunch flowered into reasonable suspicion, based on articulable facts....”).
  • State v. Denson 83 So. 3d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Simpson 77 So. 3d 445 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Mulder 76 So. 3d 1241 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    4 Cir. 3/5/2008), ; see also State y. Williams, (to determine whether a reasonable, articulable suspicion existed, the court must weigh all of the circumstances known to the police at the time the stop was made).
  • State v. Marino 74 So. 3d 742 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    State v. Tucker, 92-2093, 92-2130 (La.5/24/93)
  • State v. Morgan 59 So. 3d 403 La. 2011
    Belton, 441 So.2d at 1198 ( ).
  • State v. Welch 59 So. 3d 441 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Spells 56 So. 3d 1073 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    State v. Britton, 93-1990, p. 2 (La.1/27/94), ( ).
  • State v. Cooper 55 So. 3d 873 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
  • State v. Juengain 41 So. 3d 499 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Stowe 25 So. 3d 945 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
  • State v. Palmer 14 So. 3d 304 La. 2009
    It is not necessarily indicative of wrongdoing, but it is certainly suggestive of such.”); (“[G]iven the sudden departure of the trio [of men] at the approach of the police, given the furtive gesture of one of them and the coincident attempt at departure by defendant in his vehicle, the officers’ hunch had flowered into reasonable suspicion, based on articu-lable facts....
  • State v. O'NEAL 7 So. 3d 182 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
  • State v. Cooper 2 So. 3d 1172 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
  • State of Louisiana v. Marty Palmer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Palmer 1 So. 3d 689 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    4 Cir.1990); Coleman, , writ denied
  • State ex rel. B.C. 991 So. 2d 575 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State Ex Rel. Bc 991 So. 2d 575 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
  • State v. James 980 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    744 , 151 L.Ed.2d 740 (2002); (to determine whether a reasonable, articula-ble suspicion existed, the court must weigh all of the circumstances known to the police at the time the stop was made).
  • State v. Walker 953 So. 2d 786 La. 2007
    Although flight, nervousness, or a startled look at the sight of a police officer is, by itself, insufficient to justify an investigatory stop, State v. Chopin, supra ; this type of conduct may be highly suspicious and, therefore, may be one of the factors leading to a finding of reasonable cause
  • State v. Kelly 946 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    estigatory stop on less than probable cause to arrest, the police must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person *225 stopped of criminal activity); (an investigative stop must be justified by some objective manifestation that the person to be stopped is or is about to be engaged in criminal activity); (mere suspicious activity is not a sufficient basis for police interference with an individual's freedom).
  • State v. Knowles 917 So. 2d 1262 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    State v. Wesley, supra .
  • State of Louisiana v. Danny Ray Sherman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Sherman 896 So. 2d 1194 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Thompson 894 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    State v. Wesley, 28,012 (La.App.2d Cir.4/3/96), , writ denied, 96-1127 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State v. Bradley 867 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
  • State of Louisiana v. Charles E Morris, Glenivan Cottle and Donell Badgett La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Temple 854 So. 2d 856 La. 2003
  • State v. Sims 851 So. 2d 1039 La. 2003
    (While nervousness or startled behavior at the sight of a police officer is not in and of itself enough to constitute reasonable suspicion, it is a factor to consider.).
  • State v. Dupleche 823 So. 2d 1018 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • State v. Legett 819 So. 2d 1104 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • State v. Johnson 806 So. 2d 647 La. 2002
  • State v. McDaniels 803 So. 2d 966 La. 2001
  • State v. Vingle 802 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    ("[G]iven the sudden departure of the trio at the approach of the police, given the furtive gesture of one of them and the coincident attempt at departure by defendant in his vehicle, the officers' hunch flowered into reasonable suspicion, based on articulable facts....").
  • State v. Coleman 791 So. 2d 780 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Burke 782 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Richardson 780 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Sylvester 781 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Wilson 775 So. 2d 1051 La. 2000
    ("[G]iven the sudden departure of the trio at the approach of the police, given the furtive gesture of one of them and the coincident attempt at departure by defendant in his vehicle, the officers' hunch flowered into reasonable suspicion, based on articulable facts....").
  • State v. Phillips 774 So. 2d 989 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • State v. Watson 774 So. 2d 232 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    1870 , 64 L.Ed.2d 497 (1980); State v. Williams, [ (La.10/18/82), ]supra
  • State v. Hughes 765 So. 2d 423 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Russell 764 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Lagarde 758 So. 2d 279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    1870, 1877 , 64 L.Ed.2d 497 (1980)
  • State v. Scott 754 So. 2d 1108 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    3 Cir. 12/11/96) , ; (La.
  • State v. Johnson 748 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
  • State v. Littles 742 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999