Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Goodley, 423 So. 2d 648.

31 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. Donald Ray Link La. 2024
State of Louisiana Versus Frederick Seymore, Jr. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
State Of Louisiana v. Ronald Gasser La. 2022
9 8 the invalidity of the verdict under Ramos, and a discussion of whether the State was collaterally estopped from charging the defendant with aggravated obstruction of a highway at his retrial.
State of Louisiana Versus Ronald Gasser La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
art. 598(A) provides: “When a person is found guilty of a lesser degree of the offense charged, the verdict or judgment of the court is an acquittal of all greater offenses charged in the indictment and the defendant cannot thereafter be tried for those offenses on a new trial.” (La.
State Of Louisiana v. Michael Hawk La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Const, art. I, § 19; - 52 La.
State of Louisiana v. Cody Nicholas Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
the supreme court reasoned that an illegal verdict is equivalent to no verdict, either of conviction or acquittal.
State of Louisiana v. MacHell Rodgers La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
the supreme court held that a “non-waivable defect, such as an illegal verdict, prevents a jury from delivering either a conviction or acquittal[.]” The court went on to state that an illegal verdict at a defendant’s first trial will not support a plea of double jeopardy barring a re-trial.
State of Louisiana v. Donald Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
the supreme court held that when a “non-waivable defect, such as an illegal verdict, prevents a jury from delivering either a conviction or acquittal at a defendant’s first trial, that defendant cannot avail 3 himself of the plea of double jeopardy.” The
State v. Serigne 193 So. 3d 297 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
See State v. Davenport, 13-1859, p. 20 (La.5/7/14), ().
State v. Greene 109 So. 3d 370 La. 2013
State of Louisiana v. Edras Brown La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
914(A) provides in part that “[a] motion for an appeal may be made orally in open court or by filing a written motion with the clerk.” We have repeatedly emphasized that this article “should be construed liberally to effectuate a defendant’s constitutional right of appeal in Louisiana.” State v. Murphy, 07-2032 (La.2/22/08), ().
State v. Brown 104 So. 3d 646 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
art. 914(A) provides in part that “[a] motion for an appeal may be made orally in open court or by filing a written motion with the clerk.” We have repeatedly emphasized that this article “should be construed liberally to effectuate a defendant’s constitutional right of appeal in Louisiana.” State v. Murphy, 07-2032 (La.2/22/08), ().
State of Louisiana v. Tyrone A. Murray La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
914(A) provides in part that “[a] motion for an appeal may be made orally in open court or by filing a written motion with the clerk.” We have repeatedly emphasized that this article “should be construed liberally to effectuate a defendant’s constitutional right of appeal in Louisiana.” State v. Murphy, 07-2032 (La.2/22/08), ().
State v. Murray 92 So. 3d 591 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
art. 914(A) provides in part that “[a] motion for an appeal may be made orally in open court or by filing a written motion with the clerk.” We have repeatedly emphasized that this article “should be construed liberally to effectuate a defendant’s constitutional right of appeal in Louisiana.” State v. Murphy, 07-2032 (La.2/22/08), ().
State of Louisiana v. Marcus Quinn, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Quinn 38 So. 3d 1102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
493 , 169 L.Ed.2d 368 (2007)
State v. Means 32 So. 3d 805 La. 2010
art. 914(A) provides in part that “[a] motion for an appeal may be made orally in open court or by filing a written motion with the clerk.” We have repeatedly emphasized that this article “should be construed liberally to effectuate a defendant’s constitutional right of appeal in Louisiana.” State v. Murphy, 07-2032 (La.2/22/08), ().
State v. Murphy 974 So. 2d 1290 La. 2008
Const. art. I, § 19; ("Appeals have always been favored in the law of this state.") (citation omitted).
State v. Crandell 924 So. 2d 122 La. 2006
State of Louisiana v. Ricky J. Langley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
wherein it was determined that an illegally obtained manslaughter verdict did not bar retrial for first degree murder based on double jeopardy.
State v. Langley 896 So. 2d 200 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
wherein it was determined that an illegally obtained manslaughter verdict did not bar retrial for first degree murder based on double jeopardy.
State v. Smith 815 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
*424 2d Cir., 1983) , (La.1982).
State v. Williams 800 So. 2d 790 La. 2001
297 (La.1985) (holding that an appellate court may not correct an illegally lenient sentence by imposing a two-year firearm enhancement penalty when the defendant was not charged with its violation, even if the law is stated in mandatory terms); ( per curiam ) (stating that "[i]ncreasing a lawful sentence chills the right to appeal."); -652 (La.
State v. Norman 799 So. 2d 619 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Self 772 So. 2d 337 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
State v. Sneed 571 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
The defendants in the instant case, Bobby Ray Sneed and Eugene Wright, were granted post-conviction relief in 1986 appeal after remand
State v. Mayeux 526 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
and United States v. Jorn, 400 U.S. 470 , 91 S.Ct.
State v. Ruff 504 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Mayeux 498 So. 2d 701 La. 1986
State v. Counterman 461 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
[2] The complete remarks of Delegate Avant are found in 6 Records of the Louisiana Constitutional Convention of 1973: Convention, Transcripts p. 1133 for September 6, 1973, and are attached hereto as Appendix A. [3] It should be noted that the Simmons and Marcell interpretation of Article I, § 19
State v. Jackson 452 So. 2d 682 La. 1984
Unfortunately, although the import of the ruling was very clear, this court cited the wrong Goodley decision, the correct citation being