Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Anthony, 427 So. 2d 1155.

21 citing documents.

  • State v. Brooks 48 So. 3d 219 La. 2010
  • State v. Davis 30 So. 3d 201 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    the defendant burglarized an apartment.
  • State v. Bordelon 33 So. 3d 842 La. 2009
    P. art. 611(A)(‘‘If acts constituting an offense or if the elements of an offense occurred in more than one place, in or out of the parish of state, the offense is deemed to have been committed in any parish in this state in which any such act or element occurred.”); (‘‘When ‘res gestae’ has been used to determine whether the homicide was committed in the perpetration of a certain felony, it seems to have been a short way of saying that the underlying felony and the homicide form part of one con
  • State v. George 908 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    337 , 98 L.Ed.2d 363 (1987); (La.
  • State v. Wiley 880 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
  • State v. Louviere 833 So. 2d 885 La. 2002
    (deciding whether a killing occurred *908 during the perpetration of a felony, this court held that the homicide falls within the "ambit of the statute if it was within the `res gestae' of the underlying felony.").
  • State v. Goodley 820 So. 2d 478 La. 2002
    [and] unquestionably occurred while defendant was engaged in armed robbery."); (La.
  • State v. Lowery 781 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
  • State v. Smith 748 So. 2d 1139 La. 1999
  • State v. Craig 699 So. 2d 865 La. 1997
    (under felony murder doctrine, the felony and the homicide need not occur simultaneously as long as they take place during a single, "continuous transaction without a significant break in the chain of events").
  • State v. Banning 532 So. 2d 751 La. 1988
  • State v. Jones 525 So. 2d 1149 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Brooks 505 So. 2d 714 La. 1987
    this Court considered whether an underlying felony had been completed before commission of a homicide.
  • State v. Bates 495 So. 2d 1262 La. 1986
  • State v. Miller 489 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
    a conviction for first degree murder was affirmed where the homicide occurred during the defendant's flight after committing an aggravated burglary.
  • State v. Arvel 481 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Jones 478 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Rounds 476 So. 2d 965 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    and the cases cited therein.
  • State v. Young 469 So. 2d 1014 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    the Supreme Court was faced with an analogous issue in a case wherein the defendant murdered a witness who saw him flee from an aggravated burglary.
  • State v. Holmes 451 So. 2d 1175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Shilling 440 So. 2d 110 La. 1983