Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Berry, 430 So. 2d 1005.

39 citing documents.

  • State v. Dressner 255 So. 3d 537 La. 2018
    1984) ; State v. Berry , , 1007 (La.
  • State v. Reeves 254 So. 3d 665 La. 2018
    1984) ; State v. Berry , , 1007 (La.
  • State v. Broadway 252 So. 3d 878 La. 2018
    1984) ; State v. Berry , , 1007 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert Leroy McCoy 218 So. 3d 535 La. 2016
    because of tactical decisions in trying the case like the arguments to which defendant now takes exception.”); -15 (La.
  • State v. Tyler 181 So. 3d 678 La. 2015
    IsA defendant at the penálty phase of a capital trial is entitled to the assistance of a reasonably competent attorney acting as a diligent, conscientious advocate for his life, (on reh’g); see also Burger v. Kemp, 483 U.S. 776, 788-89 , 107 S.Ct.
  • State v. Lee 181 So. 3d 631 La. 2015
    A defendant at the penalty phase of a capital trial is entitled to the assistance of a reasonably competent attorney acting as a diligent, conscientious advocate for his life, (on reh’g); see also Burger v. Kemp, 483 U.S. 776, 788-89 , 107 S.Ct.
  • State ex rel. Wearry v. Cain 161 So. 3d 620 La. 2015
  • State v. Ford 57 So. 3d 297 La. 2011
  • State v. Taylor 838 So. 2d 729 La. 2003
    (admission of guilt to second degree murder helped defendant avoid death penalty); -1015 (La.1983)(admission of intent to rob held not ineffective because intent was obvious and counsel, in arguing defendant was not guilty of first degree murder, was establishing candor with the jury).
  • State v. Hoffman 768 So. 2d 542 La. 2000
    457 *579 (La.1983) (admission of guilt to second degree murder helped defendant avoid death penalty); -15 (La.1983) (admission of intent to rob held not ineffective because intent was obvious and counsel, in arguing defendant was not guilty of first degree murder, was establishing candor with the jury).
  • State v. Green 666 So. 2d 1302 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Johnson 652 So. 2d 1061 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Sanders 648 So. 2d 1272 La. 1994
  • State v. Dixon 631 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
  • State v. Hall 606 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
  • State v. Dickerson 579 So. 2d 472 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Melbert 546 So. 2d 948 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Harris 540 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
    3rd Cir.1985), writ denied
  • State v. Everett 530 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    156 , 93 L.Ed.2d 96 (1986)
  • State v. Gunter 525 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    the Louisiana Supreme Court established a test for the analysis of claims of ineffective assistance of counsel.
  • State v. Pierre 524 So. 2d 1289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    this court established a meaningful analysis for claims of ineffective assistance of counsel.
  • State v. Seay 521 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Brooks 505 So. 2d 714 La. 1987
    2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); -72 (La.1986); State v. *724 Felde, cert.
  • State v. Boyd 503 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
    Graffagnino v. King, supra, in which it established a "meaningful analysis" for claims of ineffective assistance of counsel.
  • State v. Mitchell 498 So. 2d 1190 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    2d Cir.1986), our brethren of the Second Circuit, with whom we agree, stated: " the Louisiana Supreme Court essentially anticipated Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct.
  • State v. Deaton 486 So. 2d 1134 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    the Louisiana Supreme Court essentially anticipated Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct.
  • State v. Arvie 482 So. 2d 1083 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    this court established a meaningful analysis for claims of ineffective assistance of counsel.
  • State v. Beverly 483 So. 2d 1027 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Hartman 479 So. 2d 948 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Murray 476 So. 2d 1170 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    which adopted the two-pronged inquiry of McQueen v. Swenson, 498 F.2d 207 (8th Cir.1974).
  • State v. White 476 So. 2d 1162 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    the Louisiana Supreme Court established a test for analysis of claims of ineffective assistance of counsel.
  • State v. Long 473 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Green 470 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    this court established a meaningful analysis for claims of ineffective assistance of counsel.
  • State v. Williams 480 So. 2d 721 La. 1985
  • State v. Fuller 454 So. 2d 119 La. 1984
  • State v. Bourgeois 451 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    at 1007 (La.1983): Defendants in criminal trials are entitled to effective assistance of counsel under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Art. 1, § 13 of the Louisiana Constitution.
  • State v. Caillier 450 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
    " this court established a meaningful analysis for claims of ineffective assistance of counsel.
  • State v. Henderson 444 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    Thus defendant does not show that trial counsel committed an essential error of judgment in either regard, much less that any such error prejudiced him, before a conviction can be set aside for lack of effective counsel.
  • State Ex Rel. Graffagnino v. King 436 So. 2d 559 La. 1983
    this court established a meaningful analysis for claims of ineffective assistance of counsel.