DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hoffer, 420 So. 2d 1090.

20 citing documents.

  • State v. Frost 99 So. 3d 1075 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Johnson 719 So. 2d 68 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
  • State v. Clower 715 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    These actions, although alone possibly insufficient to prove the requisite intent to permanently deprive, *104 must be considered with defendant's concomitant and subsequent behavior in never returning or offering to return the funds but, instead, spending the money.
  • State v. Lee 640 So. 2d 270 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    involved the use of circumstantial | (¡evidence to prove intent to defraud in the prosecution for theft in excess of $500.00.
  • State v. King 554 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Adams 532 So. 2d 965 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Crosby 515 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Teeter 504 So. 2d 1036 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    which involved a factual situation somewhat similar to the instant case.
  • Distinguished State v. Hernandez 503 So. 2d 1181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    which defendant cites, is distinguishable from this case.
  • State v. McBride 492 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Saucier 485 So. 2d 584 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    a defendant was charged with theft by fraud after he misrepresented himself as a bonded and licensed car dealer, signed bank drafts for fourteen cars at an auction, and subsequently paid only three of the drafts.
  • State v. Langford 467 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Robinson 463 So. 2d 663 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
    the defendant falsely represented himself as a licensed and bonded auctioneer.
  • State v. Booker 444 So. 2d 238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Daigle 439 So. 2d 595 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Norman 434 So. 2d 1291 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    2141 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1 (1978); State v. Williams, supra.
  • State v. Reynolds 436 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the standard of review applicable in this type of situation: “Our standard of review in cases where a conviction is challenged based on insufficiency of the evidence is mandated by Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. MacK 435 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Kohler 434 So. 2d 1110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    our Supreme Court enunciated the standard of review employed in this type of situation: Our standard of review in cases where a conviction is challenged based on insufficiency of the evidence is mandated by Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Williams 423 So. 2d 1048 La. 1983
    2141 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1 (1978)