Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Billiot, 421 So. 2d 864.

28 citing documents.

  • State v. CURINGTON 51 So. 3d 764 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Johnson 820 So. 2d 604 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    State v. Hayes, 98-485, pp. 11-12 (La.App.
  • State v. Jones 769 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • State v. Hayes 726 So. 2d 39 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Phillips 659 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Walters 630 So. 2d 1371 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
  • State v. Robinson 563 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    art. 921; -868 (La.1982); (La.App.
  • State v. Harper 548 So. 2d 1281 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Jones 544 So. 2d 1209 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Grant 517 So. 2d 1151 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Howard 517 So. 2d 266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Price 517 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    15:447, 448....” is found the following: “The amount of time that elapses between the statement and the occurrence of the crime is not the sole consideration of res gestae.
  • State v. Narcisse 512 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    The appellate court held the officer’s testimony “was clearly hearsay evidence and as such, should have been excluded.” defendant made an inculpatory statement in the presence of two female companions who were with him prior and subsequent to his commission of a homicide.
  • State v. Weiland 505 So. 2d 702 La. 1987
    was a heinous killing during which the victim of an armed robbery was cut, stabbed, beaten, knifed, and drowned.
  • State v. Landry 502 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Shelton 490 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Smith 489 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
    State v. Jackson, supra; State v. Perry, supra.
  • State v. Larsen 489 So. 2d 324 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Trahan 481 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    NOTES [1] See also State v. Gautreaux, supra , -68 (La.1982), for the proposition that where there is overwhelming evidence of defendant's guilt, the improper admission of an inculpatory statement is harmless error.
  • State v. Reynolds 473 So. 2d 886 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Smith 466 So. 2d 1343 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    that "[t]he doctrine of res gestae includes not only spontaneous utterances and declarations made before and after commission of the crime, but also testimony of witnesses and police officers pertaining to what they heard or observed before, during, or after the commission of the crime if the continuou
  • State v. Santee 464 So. 2d 922 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Boudreaux 454 So. 2d 1293 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Armstrong 453 So. 2d 1256 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Volpe 447 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Doucet 443 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Shilling 440 So. 2d 110 La. 1983
  • State Ex Rel. Graffagnino v. King 436 So. 2d 559 La. 1983