Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Billiot, 421 So. 2d 864.
- State v. CURINGTON 51 So. 3d 764 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
-
State v. Johnson
820 So. 2d 604
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Hayes, 98-485, pp. 11-12 (La.App.
- State v. Jones 769 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
- State v. Hayes 726 So. 2d 39 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
- State v. Phillips 659 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
- State v. Walters 630 So. 2d 1371 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
-
State v. Robinson
563 So. 2d 477
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
art. 921; -868 (La.1982); (La.App.
- State v. Harper 548 So. 2d 1281 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- State v. Jones 544 So. 2d 1209 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
- State v. Grant 517 So. 2d 1151 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
- State v. Howard 517 So. 2d 266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
-
State v. Price
517 So. 2d 858
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
15:447, 448....” is found the following: “The amount of time that elapses between the statement and the occurrence of the crime is not the sole consideration of res gestae.
-
State v. Narcisse
512 So. 2d 565
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
The appellate court held the officer’s testimony “was clearly hearsay evidence and as such, should have been excluded.” defendant made an inculpatory statement in the presence of two female companions who were with him prior and subsequent to his commission of a homicide.
-
State v. Weiland
505 So. 2d 702
La. 1987
was a heinous killing during which the victim of an armed robbery was cut, stabbed, beaten, knifed, and drowned.
- State v. Landry 502 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
- State v. Shelton 490 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
-
State v. Smith
489 So. 2d 255
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
State v. Jackson, supra; State v. Perry, supra.
- State v. Larsen 489 So. 2d 324 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
-
State v. Trahan
481 So. 2d 729
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
NOTES [1] See also State v. Gautreaux, supra , -68 (La.1982), for the proposition that where there is overwhelming evidence of defendant's guilt, the improper admission of an inculpatory statement is harmless error.
- State v. Reynolds 473 So. 2d 886 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
-
State v. Smith
466 So. 2d 1343
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
that "[t]he doctrine of res gestae includes not only spontaneous utterances and declarations made before and after commission of the crime, but also testimony of witnesses and police officers pertaining to what they heard or observed before, during, or after the commission of the crime if the continuou
- State v. Santee 464 So. 2d 922 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
- State v. Boudreaux 454 So. 2d 1293 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
- State v. Armstrong 453 So. 2d 1256 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
- State v. Volpe 447 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
- State v. Doucet 443 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
- State v. Shilling 440 So. 2d 110 La. 1983
- State Ex Rel. Graffagnino v. King 436 So. 2d 559 La. 1983