DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Williams, 423 So. 2d 1048.

23 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Arijoray Lavon Copeland La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
  • State v. Ellis 161 So. 3d 64 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    15:438.’ ” Shapiro, 431 So.2d at 384 ().
  • State v. Mack 144 So. 3d 983 La. 2014
    15:438, to decide as a matter of law whether every reasonable hypothesis of innocence has been | nexcluded, assuming every fact proven that the evidence tends to prove.”); (“The Louisiana legislature has, through this statute, provided greater protection against erroneous convictions based on circumstantial evidence than is provided by the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • State v. Persley 918 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    2141 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1 (1978); (La.
  • State v. MM 802 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    [8] [9] 98-398 (La.4/11/00); .
  • State v. M.M. 802 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Monds 631 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Hosford 572 So. 2d 242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    1982) for the proposition that the circumstantial evidence rule (LSA-R.S.
  • State v. Davis 535 So. 2d 34 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    the court noted: Circumstantial evidence in Louisiana criminal convictions is held to a higher standard.
  • State v. Gardner 524 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. McFadden 476 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Grabert 467 So. 2d 1327 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Guillory 461 So. 2d 492 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Robertson 454 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Scott 451 So. 2d 1135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Nash 446 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Howard 441 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Johnson 440 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    [5] This metamorphosis is revealed in the following cases: (La.
  • State v. Korman 439 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Norman 434 So. 2d 1291 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Chism 436 So. 2d 464 La. 1983
  • State v. Gomez 433 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Shapiro 431 So. 2d 372 La. 1983
    We had occasion recently to consider the standards by which the sufficiency of the evidence is to be judged in this state in the second degree murder case of State v. Lenon Williams