Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Ray, 423 So. 2d 1116.

149 citing documents.

State v. King 951 So. 2d 384 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Smith 936 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Hopkins 908 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Donnaud 896 So. 2d 1151 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Tate 880 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Herron 879 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
State v. Simmons 845 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Ware, 01-194, p. 15 (La.App.
State v. Grainer 834 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Jones 814 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Francis 809 So. 2d 1029 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Landrum 796 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Lee 787 So. 2d 1020 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Carter 772 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Jones 769 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Behrnes 706 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
: At the sentencing hearing, the defendant had expressed a desire to show circumstances which mitigated against imposition of the maximum sentence.
State v. Anderson 697 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Thames 681 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Milstead 681 So. 2d 1274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
It cites the following cases in support of this view: (La.App.
State v. Page 680 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
State v. Huff 660 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
State v. Williams, 25,835 (La.App.
State v. Busby 653 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
explained: However, the failure of the state to comply with the discovery procedure will not automatically command reversal.
State v. Guidry 647 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
State v. DeWoody 645 So. 2d 290 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. McPherson 630 So. 2d 935 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
State v. Coker 625 So. 2d 190 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
State v. Wimberly 618 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
-21 (La.1982); , 1328 n. 1 (La.1982).
State v. Gantt 616 So. 2d 1300 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Anseman 607 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
In arguing this assignment of error, where the Louisiana Supreme Court vacated the defendant's sentence and remanded the case for resentencing after finding that the trial judge had failed to adequately consider the La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Green 598 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
State v. Hamilton 594 So. 2d 1376 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Art. 875; State v. Williams, supra .
State v. Harmon 594 So. 2d 1054 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
State v. Riley 587 So. 2d 130 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
in which the Supreme Court found that the trial court had erred in considering matters about which there was no evidence in the record.
State v. Hughes 587 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Collins 584 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. Driggers 582 So. 2d 369 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Lewis 578 So. 2d 253 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Moore 575 So. 2d 928 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Coleman 574 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
46 , 62 L.Ed.2d 31 (1979); (La.
State v. Robinson 569 So. 2d 82 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Williams 567 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Winston 567 So. 2d 1131 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Vailes 564 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Padgett 558 So. 2d 593 La. 1990
State v. Laird 548 So. 2d 373 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Hall 549 So. 2d 373 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Breaux 546 So. 2d 1352 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Tate 543 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Scoby 536 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Lewis 535 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Quintero 527 So. 2d 598 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by