Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jackson, 450 So. 2d 621.

168 citing documents.

State v. Francis 809 So. 2d 1029 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Kirk 773 So. 2d 259 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Creecy, 98-1472, p. 6 (La.App.
State v. Carter 772 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Dorsey 763 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Creecy, 98-1472, p. 6 (La.App.
State v. Bryant 754 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Pollard 760 So. 2d 362 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Patterson 752 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Creecy 742 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Hampton 750 So. 2d 867 La. 1999
State v. Alexis 738 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Jackson 733 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Snyder 750 So. 2d 832 La. 1999
State v. Fisher 720 So. 2d 1179 La. 1998
("A warrantless arrest, no less than an arrest pursuant to a validly issued warrant, must be based on probable cause.") Indeed, the present case is an excellent example of a situation where the warrant process would have been beneficial.
State v. Dorsey 718 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
State v. Jasper, 28,187 (La.App.
State v. Pomeroy 713 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Thomas 711 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
State v. Lewis 728 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
State v. Hardy 711 So. 2d 715 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
State v. Campbell, 94-1140 (La.
State v. Harris 708 So. 2d 1169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Arvie 709 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
In brief, for the proposition that res gestae evidence is not subject to the general La.Code Evid.
State v. Styles 692 So. 2d 1222 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
State v. Hebert 688 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Thames 681 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Leagea, 95-1210 (La.App.
State v. Cooper 678 So. 2d 59 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Jasper 677 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Leagea 673 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Buchanon 673 So. 2d 663 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Davis 674 So. 2d 1013 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Campbell 673 So. 2d 1061 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Bailey 664 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
State v. Willars 661 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
State v. Harris, 26,411 (La.App.2d Cir. 10/26/94), .
State v. McBroom 655 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
State v. Dominick 658 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
-34 (La.1984): When the penalty imposed by the statute is a mandatory one, the trial judge must inform the jury of the penalty on the request of the defendant and must permit the defense to argue the penalty to the jury.
State v. Harris 645 So. 2d 224 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Grubbs 644 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Giles 639 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Harrison 628 So. 2d 104 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Griffin 618 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Wright 618 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Simon 617 So. 2d 153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Richardson 616 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
State v. Williams 606 So. 2d 1387 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Mitchell 606 So. 2d 17 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Owens 596 So. 2d 829 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Vergo 594 So. 2d 1360 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Potter 591 So. 2d 1166 La. 1991
[4] It contends that because Potter made no objection to the state's use of its peremptory challenges at trial, he was precluded from raising the issue on appeal, State ex rel.
State v. Gene 587 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Art. 404B(1) and related comments
State v. Gene 587 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Art. 404B(1) and related comments; State v. Schwartz.
State v. Collins 584 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. Baker 582 So. 2d 1320 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991