Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Brown, 428 So. 2d 438.

58 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Donald Alan Crooks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
directly to” “[a]nother crime committed or alleged to have been committed by the defendant as to which evidence is not 32 admissible[.]” In so doing, the court abrogated the previous per se prejudicial analysis used to overturn convictions for the erroneous introduction of other crimes evidence, even where such evidence was not objected to
State Of Louisiana v. Melanie Barnett Curtin La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. William Gary Ryder La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
15:447 (“What forms any part of the res gestae is always admissible in evidence.”); ( “[E]vidence of other crimes included in the res gestae is admissible without balancing its probative value against the prejudicial effect.”) (citations omitted); State v. Smith, 94–1502, p. 6 (La.App.
State v. Rapp 161 So. 3d 103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Norah 131 So. 3d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
with Colomb, 98-2813 at pp. 4-5, 747 So.2d at 1076 .
State of Louisiana v. Robyn B. Little Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
at 525 ( overruled on other grounds by State v. Johnson, 94-1379 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Carol Noland Saltzman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
at 525 ( overruled on other grounds by State v. Johnson, 94-1379 (La.
State v. Davis 129 So. 3d 554 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
at 525 ( overruled on other grounds by State v. Johnson, 94-1379 (La.11/27/95), ).
State v. Saltzman 128 So. 3d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Higginbotham 122 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
which generally stated this rule, but determined that the defendant was not entitled to a mistrial under La.
State v. Taylor 838 So. 2d 729 La. 2003
State v. Mims 769 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
15:447 ("What forms any part of the res gestae is always admissible in evidence."); ("[E]vidence of other crimes included in the res gestae is admissible without balancing its probative value against the prejudicial effect.") (citations omitted); State v. Smith, 94-1502, p. 6 (La.App.
State v. Birklett 749 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Colomb 747 So. 2d 1074 La. 1999
15:447 ("What forms any part of the res gestae is always admissible in evidence."); ("[E]vidence of other crimes included in the res gestae is admissible without balancing its probative value against the prejudicial effect.") (citations omitted); State v. Smith, 94-1502, p. 6 (La.App.
State v. Girod 703 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
State v. Akins 687 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
In State v. Johnson, 94-1379 (La.11/27/95), , stating: “...
State v. Thomas 685 So. 2d 261 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
State v. Johnson 664 So. 2d 94 La. 1995
The supreme court, noted as to other crimes evidence that, "...
State v. Nedd 647 So. 2d 346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Johnson 631 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
The supreme court, noted as to other crimes evidence that, "...
State v. Silguero 594 So. 2d 1070 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
This court has consistently held, that inadmissible other crimes evidence is per se prejudicial and a substantial violation of the statutory right.
State v. Lewis 590 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
The court in State v. Brown, supra, [ ], page 443, explained that ‘(t)here is scarcely room for a harmless error argument with regard to other crimes evidence.
State v. Brewington 587 So. 2d 189 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
State v. Trosclair 584 So. 2d 270 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Trahan 576 So. 2d 1 La. 1991
State v. Clayton 570 So. 2d 519 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
State v. Robinson 567 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Volentine 565 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Hall 558 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Hicks 554 So. 2d 1298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Hall 549 So. 2d 373 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Lewis 535 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Wascom 524 So. 2d 1342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Edouard 512 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Digilormo 505 So. 2d 1154 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Scott 503 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Olson 503 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. O'NEAL 501 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Williams 500 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Thompson 489 So. 2d 1364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Walker 489 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Penny 486 So. 2d 879 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Williams 486 So. 2d 889 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Watson 484 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Taylor 483 So. 2d 232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
15:448 provides: “To constitute res gestae the circumstances and declarations must be necessary incidents of the criminal act, or immediate concomitants of it, or form in conjunction with it one continuous transaction.” the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: “...
State v. O'NEAL 478 So. 2d 1311 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Jones 478 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Green 478 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Boudreaux 471 So. 2d 1021 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Hoyt 464 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
in which reference to other crimes was admitted as part of the res gestae without previous notice.