Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Trahan, 425 So. 2d 1222.

340 citing documents.

State v. Avila 550 So. 2d 1374 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
State v. Alexander 551 So. 2d 34 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Carroll 546 So. 2d 1365 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Segura 546 So. 2d 1347 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Winzer 545 So. 2d 1259 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Jones 544 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. James 545 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Heacox 543 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Martin 543 So. 2d 1020 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Foster 541 So. 2d 238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Jackson 540 So. 2d 533 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
1982), affirmed on remand
State v. Reaux 539 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
the court stated "the jurisprudence has not established precise guidelines as to what constitutes `possession' of drugs under the narcotic laws.
State v. Richardson 533 So. 2d 1316 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. White 535 So. 2d 929 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
the defendant contends that evidence of such a small amount (a residue) of a controlled dangerous substance is insufficient to prove possession beyond a reasonable doubt, and thus to obtain a conviction.
State v. Laird 532 So. 2d 809 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Johnson 529 So. 2d 142 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
State v. Ashlock 526 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Hodges 526 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Hall 524 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
State v. Love 527 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Michaels 516 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Kingsmill 514 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Walker 514 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Johnson 513 So. 2d 832 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Hernandez 513 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Wells 517 So. 2d 839 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Bunch 510 So. 2d 1266 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Freeman 503 So. 2d 501 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Mercadel 503 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. O'NEAL 501 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Gray 502 So. 2d 1114 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Turner 499 So. 2d 1282 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Broadnax 503 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Hills 498 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Oliver 499 So. 2d 295 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Petta 496 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Maresco 495 So. 2d 311 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Cathey 493 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
State v. Brown 490 So. 2d 601 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Moore 490 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Shelton 490 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Jordan 489 So. 2d 994 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Hayes 488 So. 2d 1287 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Fernandez 489 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Means 486 So. 2d 992 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Francis 482 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
1982); this discretion is not unbridled.
State v. Browning 475 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Davis 477 So. 2d 1313 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Johnson 477 So. 2d 1315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Caston 477 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985