DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Ricks, 428 So. 2d 794.

19 citing documents.

  • State of Louisana Versus Dan Robertson La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
  • State of Louisiana v. Patrick Michael Shelvin AKA - Patrick Shelvin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    The supreme court reversed the defendant’s
  • State v. Shelvin 181 So. 3d 879 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    • The supreme court reversed the defendant’s
  • State v. Richard 115 So. 3d 86 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Wright 840 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    there was a forced entry (screen door latch pulled loose) around midnight.
  • State ex rel. Nelson 533 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    in each of which cases the court found the evidence was insufficient to prove intent to commit theft or felony in a prosecution for attempted burglary or burglary.
  • State v. Conley 531 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Wilson 508 So. 2d 960 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Bunch 510 So. 2d 1266 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Steward 483 So. 2d 155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    defendant knew the victim and offered the explanation that he was dropping in for a social call.
  • State v. Harper 480 So. 2d 483 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Rounds 476 So. 2d 965 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    there was a forced entry (screen door latch pulled loose) around midnight.
  • State v. Smith 463 So. 2d 16 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Patterson 459 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    Defendant does not deny his presence in the house, but rather
  • State v. Robinson 442 So. 2d 827 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
  • State v. Merrell 442 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Stephens 438 So. 2d 203 La. 1983
  • State v. Jacobs 435 So. 2d 1014 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    (1983), Justice Watson summarized the applicable law as follows: "In reviewing a conviction where proof of an element of the offense is based on an inference from circumstantial evidence, the court must consider two standards: that of Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Bowman 434 So. 2d 1175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    The serious issue here is whether the State excluded every reasonable hypothesis of innocence when it relied upon circumstantial evidence