DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Freeman, 427 So. 2d 1161.

68 citing documents.

  • State v. Richardson 616 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
  • State v. Sparrow 612 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
  • State v. Braswell 605 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
    the Supreme Court indicated in dictum that the defendant in such a case may have the burden of proving self-defense by a preponderance of the evidence.
  • State v. Barnes 590 So. 2d 1298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    the Louisiana *1301 Supreme Court indicated, in dicta, that the defendant in a non-homicide case may have the burden of proving self-defense by a preponderance of the evidence, without resolving the issue [4] .
  • State v. Willis 591 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State v. Kalathakis 543 So. 2d 1004 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Blancaneaux 535 So. 2d 1341 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Martin 520 So. 2d 1079 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
    the Louisiana Supreme Court decided that it did not have to resolve that issue stating: "We need not, ...
  • State v. Agnelly 515 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
    the supreme court stated: "[1] In the non-homicide situation, the defense of self-defense requires a dual inquiry; an objective inquiry into whether the force used was reasonable under the circumstances; a subjective inquiry into whether the force was apparently necessary.
  • State v. Mason 499 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    the Louisiana Supreme Court dealt with a defendant who had asserted self-defense to an aggravated battery charge and who was subsequently convicted.
  • State v. Navarre 498 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Barnes 491 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Lejeune 487 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Argo 476 So. 2d 409 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    where the Supreme Court found that: "Different statutory standards do exist to justify the use of force or violence under La.R.S.
  • State v. Zeno 469 So. 2d 337 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Cook 460 So. 2d 1075 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    the state and the defense argued that the standard of appellate review on appeal is whether a rational fact finder, viewing the evidence most favorable to the prosecution, could have concluded that the defendant failed to prove by preponderance of the evidence, that she acted in self defense.
  • State v. Cheatwood 458 So. 2d 907 La. 1984
  • State v. Aldridge 450 So. 2d 1057 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    *1060 Technically, this issue has not been decided in Louisiana, indicates that the burden does indeed rest on the defendant.