DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Labure, 427 So. 2d 855.

35 citing documents.

  • State in the Interest of K. Z. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
  • State ex rel. K.Z. 186 So. 3d 799 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State in the Interest of D. B. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State ex rel. D.B. 137 So. 3d 1282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. PORTIE 22 So. 3d 213 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
  • In Re Johnson 1 So. 3d 425 La. 2009
    art. 895(A)(7), and this Court’s the Hearing Officer suggested that the expansive interpretation of La.C.Cr.P.
  • State of Louisiana v. Fay v. Perez, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 3/1/06), (), this court characterized such an order as “patently erroneous.” 2 Further, because the plea agreement could have been invalidated by the vacation of the restitution order concerning victims of other charges, this court remanded the case “for an evidentiar
  • State v. Perez 939 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    App. 3 Cir. 3/1/06), (), this court characterized such an order as "patently erroneous."
  • State of Louisiana v. Steven R. Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    the supreme court determined an imposition of restitution to be improper.
  • State v. Thomas 924 So. 2d 1146 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    the supreme court determined an imposition of restitution to be improper.
  • State v. Froiland 910 So. 2d 956 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    our supreme court held it was patently erroneous to impose a condition of restitution to a victim of a burglary for which the defendant had not pleaded guilty, because that person was not an "aggrieved party" or a "victim," as provided by La.C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Boudreaux 741 So. 2d 860 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
  • State v. Jackson 734 So. 2d 54 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    State v. Jackson, 30,473 (La.App.2d Cir.5/13/98), , writ denied 98-1778 (La.11/6/98)
  • State v. Duncan 604 So. 2d 1317 La. 1992
  • State v. Duncan 604 So. 2d 1317 La. 1992
  • State v. Sartain 571 So. 2d 192 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
  • State v. Cutrera 558 So. 2d 611 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • State v. Schmidt 558 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
  • State v. Galloway 551 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    the Louisiana Supreme Court noted patent error in the requirement that the defendant pay restitution to the victim of a burglary charge that was dismissed as part of a plea bargain in which the defendant agreed to plead guilty to a remaining burglary count.
  • State v. Francois 548 So. 2d 1284 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    the Supreme Court considered, among other things, an award of restitution to victims of two different burglaries as a condition of probation.
  • State v. Lisenby 534 So. 2d 996 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Edwards 532 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Hamburg 535 So. 2d 915 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Hutchins 502 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Pashandi 490 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Elkins 489 So. 2d 232 La. 1986
    n to monetary loss sustained by victims of crime, nonetheless we have clearly stated that restitution can only be ordered for "damage or loss caused by [the] offense," (emphasis in original) and that "restitution to the victim of a crime of which the defendant was not convicted or did not plead guilty may not be imposed," (La.
  • State v. Metlin 467 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR Metlin contends that the trial court erred in ordering him to pay restitution, in the amount of $8,037.50, to those victims of burglaries committed by Alan J. Silvers when Metlin did not plead guilty to the burglaries and thefts from the parties to whom he was ordered to make restitution
  • State v. Elliott 467 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Cook 465 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Griffon 448 So. 2d 1287 La. 1984
    Defendant cannot contend that the condition of probation requires restitution for uncharged crimes [ ] because defendant entered into a separate agreement with DHHR that the $55,000 restitution (upon affirmation of conviction) would discharge any civil liability.
  • State ex rel. Sterling 441 So. 2d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    and State v. Carey, supra.
  • State v. Alleman 439 So. 2d 418 La. 1983
  • Goins v. Goins 437 So. 2d 947 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Willie 436 So. 2d 553 La. 1983
  • State v. Jessie 429 So. 2d 859 La. 1983