DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Edwards, 434 So. 2d 395.

83 citing documents.

  • State v. Martinez 552 So. 2d 1365 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
  • State v. Rawls 552 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Davis 547 So. 2d 1367 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
    State v. Ossey, supra ; State v. Wiley, supra .
  • State v. Harris 540 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Bonnett 535 So. 2d 535 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Ealy 530 So. 2d 1309 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Ortiz 520 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Prejean 520 So. 2d 1070 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Alexis 514 So. 2d 561 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
    293 , 83 L.Ed.2d 228 (1984); State v. Helwig, supra.
  • State v. Zone 511 So. 2d 96 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    Havard, 469 So.2d at 1203
  • State v. Wiley 507 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
    State v. Ossey, supra; State v. Thomas, supra.
  • State v. Bailey 500 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    the court expressly rejected “the argument that an intoxication level beyond that established as presumptive of intoxication for purposes of our DWI laws ...
  • State v. Cantanese 493 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Helwig 489 So. 2d 296 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
    293 , 83 L.Ed.2d 228 (1984)
  • State v. Thomas 482 So. 2d 32 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
    2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973) and concluded: "Upon a review of the surrounding circumstances, we cannot say that the trial judge's finding of voluntariness was in error.
  • State v. Gillen 480 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Green 480 So. 2d 883 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Owens 480 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Pautard 470 So. 2d 596 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Havard 469 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Wilson 467 So. 2d 503 La. 1985
  • State v. Ketton 468 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Burks 466 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Carter 460 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Helsley 457 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Jackson 452 So. 2d 1250 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Kellogg 452 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    This principle applies to cases involving sentences imposed after trial [State v. Smith, supra] and after a guilty plea [].
  • State v. Moran 451 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Bearden 449 So. 2d 1109 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Ossey 446 So. 2d 280 La. 1984
  • State v. Wilson 441 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    held that as the sentence imposed was the result of an understood and agreed to plea bargain, “there was no necessity of listing enumerated reasons and [we believe] that the defendant cannot complain of excessive length, [citations omitted].” which held that “[i]n several recent cases, we have held that a defendant who accepts a sentence under a plea bargain may not later assert that the sentence is excessive or that the trial judge failed to comply adequately with the sentencing guidelines of L
  • State v. Bell 438 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Mitchell 437 So. 2d 264 La. 1983