Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Godejohn, 425 So. 2d 750.

183 citing documents.

State v. Verrett 536 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Young 535 So. 2d 1150 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Wilkerson 533 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Sherman 532 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Studivant 531 So. 2d 539 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Mallett 526 So. 2d 1194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Davenport 520 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Dantoni 520 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Robert 518 So. 2d 1169 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Jackson 519 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Jones 517 So. 2d 402 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Bolen 514 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Agee 508 So. 2d 1033 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Tamez 506 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Hardan 501 So. 2d 848 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Stansell 494 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Sharlow 493 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
City of Monroe v. Sharpe, 235 La.
State v. Johnson 488 So. 2d 1298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Dominick 487 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Claborn 487 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Browning 483 So. 2d 1008 La. 1986
State v. Bain 483 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Tellez 480 So. 2d 1075 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Smith 479 So. 2d 1062 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Dufrene 479 So. 2d 11 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Where the conviction has been obtained by a plea of guilty, the issue of whether the defendant was properly “boyk-inized” also constitutes a proper inquiry in a review for “error patent.” : The colloquy which occurs when the court canvasses the matter with the accused to make sure he has a full understanding of what the plea connotes and of its consequences is a part of the plea of the accused.
State v. Oliver 478 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
and concluded that it was freely and voluntarily entered and that defendant understood the consequences of his plea even though he expressed during his colloquy with the judge a denial that he committed the crime.
State v. Jackson 477 So. 2d 796 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
: “The colloquy which occurs when the court canvasses the matter with the accused to make sure he has a full understanding of what the plea connotes and of its consequences is a part of the plea of the accused.
State v. Martinez 472 So. 2d 123 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Nicholas 462 So. 2d 1295 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
Error Patent the Louisiana Supreme Court held: [The] colloquy which occurs when court canvasses the matter with accused to make sure that accused has full understanding of what plea connotes and of its consequences is part of plea of the accused, and it is in the nature of pleading or proceeding, rather than testim
State v. Arrington 455 So. 2d 1284 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
For a constitutionally valid guilty plea, the accused must expressly and knowingly waive his right to trial by jury, his right to confront his accusers and his privilege against compulsory self-incrimination.
State v. Lynch 441 So. 2d 732 La. 1983
State v. Kahey 436 So. 2d 475 La. 1983
1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969)
State v. Hill 434 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983