Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Johnson, 432 So. 2d 815.
-
State v. Brown
665 So. 2d 477
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
the Supreme Court discussed the *479 requirements of La.R.S.
-
State v. Robinson
665 So. 2d 451
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
appeal after remand, (La.App.
- State v. Williams 660 So. 2d 919 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
- State v. Perry 657 So. 2d 437 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
- State v. Harris 654 So. 2d 680 La. 1995
-
State v. Stewart
656 So. 2d 677
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
See State v. Dorthey, supra ; (La.App.
- State v. Carruth 643 So. 2d 1319 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
-
State v. Allen
638 So. 2d 394
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
writ granted on other grounds
- State v. Carter 630 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
-
State v. Swaingan
630 So. 2d 300
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
appeal after remand, (La.App.
-
State v. Daniels
628 So. 2d 63
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that the trial court also is required to advise the accused of his statutory right to remain silent during the habitual offender proceedings.
- State v. Johnson 623 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
-
State v. Sharlow
621 So. 2d 858
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
writ granted, appeal after remand, (1st Cir.1984), appeal after remand, (1st Cir.1985), the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the requirements of LSA-R.S.
- Abshire v. Lafayette Parish School Bd. 619 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
-
State v. Wooders
615 So. 2d 936
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the trial court must advise the accused of his statutory right to remain silent during the habitual offender proceedings in order to obtain a valid stipulation.
- State v. Wheelwright 615 So. 2d 385 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
- State v. Murphy 613 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
- State v. Harris 612 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
-
State v. Gautreaux
607 So. 2d 1086
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
15:529.1(D) and the rights of which a defendant must be advised before the trial court can accept a : "The protection of the Fifth Amendment is much broader than that contemplated by the prosecution.
- State v. Deal 607 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
-
State v. Dearmas
606 So. 2d 567
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
appeal after remand, (La.
- State v. Morgan 604 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
-
State v. Brown
602 So. 2d 252
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
This section implicitly provides that the court itself must advise the defendant of his “statutory right to remain silent.”
- State v. Breaux 599 So. 2d 917 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
- State v. Martin 599 So. 2d 422 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
-
Distinguished
State v. Wright
598 So. 2d 1267
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
where the trial court during a multiple bill hearing required, over defense objection, the defendant to testify that he was the person actually convicted in the predicate offense.
- State v. Bravo 597 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
-
State v. Taylor
597 So. 2d 123
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
writ granted, on other grounds
- State v. Tate 593 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
- State v. Smith 591 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
- State v. Short 588 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
- State v. Payne 586 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
- State v. Noel 585 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
- State v. Pierce 585 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
-
State v. Riley
581 So. 2d 1077
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
appeal after remand, (La.App.
- State v. Moffett 572 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
- State v. Delaune 572 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
-
State v. McKoin
571 So. 2d 777
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
appeal after remand (La.App.
- State v. Edgar 570 So. 2d 88 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- State v. Poole 566 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
-
State v. Washington
563 So. 2d 530
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
writ granted on other grounds
-
State v. Swaingan
563 So. 2d 1204
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
1 appeal after remand, (La.App.
-
State v. Washington
563 So. 2d 530
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
writ granted on other grounds
-
State v. East
553 So. 2d 1046
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
the Supreme Court held: This section of the statute clearly recognizes that the defendant, if he chooses, has the right to remain silent.
- State v. Groce 553 So. 2d 888 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
-
State v. Mallett
552 So. 2d 28
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
where the state Supreme Court emphasized that an individual's privilege against self-incrimination was not dependent on the nature of a proceeding, acknowledged La.R.S.
- State v. Grimmett 552 So. 2d 474 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
-
State v. Robinson
549 So. 2d 1282
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: "Before the defendant chooses to acknowlege or confess in open court that he has been previously convicted of a felony, the statute requires that he first be cautioned by the trial court as to his rights.
- State v. Trollman 551 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- State v. Amos 550 So. 2d 272 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989