Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Johnson, 432 So. 2d 815.

182 citing documents.

  • State v. Brown 665 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
    the Supreme Court discussed the *479 requirements of La.R.S.
  • State v. Robinson 665 So. 2d 451 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
    appeal after remand, (La.App.
  • State v. Williams 660 So. 2d 919 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Perry 657 So. 2d 437 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • State v. Harris 654 So. 2d 680 La. 1995
  • State v. Stewart 656 So. 2d 677 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    See State v. Dorthey, supra ; (La.App.
  • State v. Carruth 643 So. 2d 1319 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Allen 638 So. 2d 394 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
    writ granted on other grounds
  • State v. Carter 630 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
  • State v. Swaingan 630 So. 2d 300 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    appeal after remand, (La.App.
  • State v. Daniels 628 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that the trial court also is required to advise the accused of his statutory right to remain silent during the habitual offender proceedings.
  • State v. Johnson 623 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • State v. Sharlow 621 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    writ granted, appeal after remand, (1st Cir.1984), appeal after remand, (1st Cir.1985), the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the requirements of LSA-R.S.
  • Abshire v. Lafayette Parish School Bd. 619 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
  • State v. Wooders 615 So. 2d 936 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the trial court must advise the accused of his statutory right to remain silent during the habitual offender proceedings in order to obtain a valid stipulation.
  • State v. Wheelwright 615 So. 2d 385 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
  • State v. Murphy 613 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • State v. Harris 612 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
  • State v. Gautreaux 607 So. 2d 1086 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
    15:529.1(D) and the rights of which a defendant must be advised before the trial court can accept a : "The protection of the Fifth Amendment is much broader than that contemplated by the prosecution.
  • State v. Deal 607 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
  • State v. Dearmas 606 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
    appeal after remand, (La.
  • State v. Morgan 604 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • State v. Brown 602 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
    This section implicitly provides that the court itself must advise the defendant of his “statutory right to remain silent.”
  • State v. Breaux 599 So. 2d 917 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
  • State v. Martin 599 So. 2d 422 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
  • Distinguished State v. Wright 598 So. 2d 1267 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
    where the trial court during a multiple bill hearing required, over defense objection, the defendant to testify that he was the person actually convicted in the predicate offense.
  • State v. Bravo 597 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • State v. Taylor 597 So. 2d 123 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
    writ granted, on other grounds
  • State v. Tate 593 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
  • State v. Smith 591 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State v. Short 588 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State v. Payne 586 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
  • State v. Noel 585 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
  • State v. Pierce 585 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Riley 581 So. 2d 1077 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    appeal after remand, (La.App.
  • State v. Moffett 572 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
  • State v. Delaune 572 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
  • State v. McKoin 571 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
    appeal after remand (La.App.
  • State v. Edgar 570 So. 2d 88 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • State v. Poole 566 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
  • State v. Washington 563 So. 2d 530 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
    writ granted on other grounds
  • State v. Swaingan 563 So. 2d 1204 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    1 appeal after remand, (La.App.
  • State v. Washington 563 So. 2d 530 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    writ granted on other grounds
  • State v. East 553 So. 2d 1046 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    the Supreme Court held: This section of the statute clearly recognizes that the defendant, if he chooses, has the right to remain silent.
  • State v. Groce 553 So. 2d 888 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Mallett 552 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
    where the state Supreme Court emphasized that an individual's privilege against self-incrimination was not dependent on the nature of a proceeding, acknowledged La.R.S.
  • State v. Grimmett 552 So. 2d 474 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Robinson 549 So. 2d 1282 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: "Before the defendant chooses to acknowlege or confess in open court that he has been previously convicted of a felony, the statute requires that he first be cautioned by the trial court as to his rights.
  • State v. Trollman 551 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Amos 550 So. 2d 272 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989