DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Chism, 436 So. 2d 464.

249 citing documents.

  • State v. Holland 544 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Sanders 542 So. 2d 1134 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Roberts 541 So. 2d 961 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Saddler 538 So. 2d 1073 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.App.
  • State v. Dickerson 538 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
  • State v. Winzer 537 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
    * This circumstantial evidence rule does not establish a standard stricter than reasonable doubt but “it emphasizes the need for careful observance of the usual standard, and provides a helpful methodology for its implementation in cases which hinge on the evaluation of circumstantial evidence.”
  • State v. Mullins 537 So. 2d 386 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Spencer 533 So. 2d 396 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Lott 535 So. 2d 963 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Ealy 530 So. 2d 1309 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Mussall 523 So. 2d 1305 La. 1988
    1986); -475 (La.1983); (citing cases); -1231 (La.1983); appeal dismissed, Graham v. Louisiana, 461 U.S. 950 , 103 S.Ct.
  • State v. Schlessinger 525 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Perkins 517 So. 2d 314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. LeBlanc 517 So. 2d 951 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Tyner 517 So. 2d 1005 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Smith 513 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Evans 512 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Zone 511 So. 2d 96 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    our Supreme Court subsumed LSA-R.S.
  • State v. Cupit 508 So. 2d 996 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Cargille 507 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Flowers 509 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Wright 506 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    15:438 does not establish a stricter standard of review than the Jackson standard but “provides a helpful methodology for its implementation in cases which hinge on the evalution of circumstantial evidence.” (La.App.
  • State v. Jacobs 504 So. 2d 817 La. 1987
  • State v. Harrison 505 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    State v. Wright, supra; "
  • State v. Blaise 504 So. 2d 1092 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Freeman 506 So. 2d 519 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    15:438 does not establish a stricter standard of review than the Jackson standard but “provides a helpful methodology for its implementation in cases which hinge on the evaluation of circumstantial evidence.”
  • State v. Brown 504 So. 2d 1055 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Burns 504 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    State v. Chism, supra [ ]
  • State v. Darby 502 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Bolden 501 So. 2d 942 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Owens 501 So. 2d 968 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. O'NEAL 501 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Aucoin 500 So. 2d 921 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Franklin 501 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
    When the direct evidence is thus viewed, the facts established by the direct evidence and inferred from the circumstantial evidence must be sufficient for a rational juror to conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant was guilty of every essential element of the crime.2 (La.
  • State v. James 499 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    State v. Wright, supra ; State v. Sutton, supra ; "
  • State v. Scott 496 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    15:438 does not establish a stricter standard of review than the Jackson standard but “provides a helpful methodology for its implementation in cases which hinge on the evaluation of circumstantial evidence.” (La.App.
  • State v. Davis 496 So. 2d 1197 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
    When the direct evidence is thus viewed, the facts established by the direct evidence and inferred from the circumstantial evidence must be sufficient for a rational juror to conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant was guilty of every essential element of the crime.2 (La.
  • State v. Cann 494 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    150 (1954); CCrP Art. 798(3)
  • State v. Sharlow 493 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
    [footnote omitted] La.R.S.
  • State v. Floyd 490 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Barnes 491 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
    The Court had earlier recognized, that the statutory provision on circumstantial evidence, La.R.S.
  • State v. Guirlando 491 So. 2d 38 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Whitaker 489 So. 2d 998 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    State v. Wright, supra ; State v. Sutton, supra
  • State v. Smith 490 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    State v. Wright, supra ; State v. Sutton, supra
  • State v. Guidry 487 So. 2d 1288 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. McGuffey 486 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    150 (1954); CCrP Art. 798(3)
  • State v. Ford 489 So. 2d 1250 La. 1986
  • State v. Lowe 485 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Taylor 485 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Langford 483 So. 2d 979 La. 1986
    The Court had earlier recognized, (La.