Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lynch, 441 So. 2d 732.

883 citing documents.

State v. Price 792 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. King 788 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Narcisse 791 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Manson 791 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Wilkinson, 00-339, p. 25 (La.App.
State v. Wilson 789 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Parent 788 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Smith 794 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Gilbert 788 So. 2d 574 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Short, 00-866, p. 14, (La.App.
State v. Ormond 786 So. 2d 187 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Williams 786 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Evans 786 So. 2d 781 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Williams 786 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Calvin 781 So. 2d 827 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Bell 781 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Jackson 814 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Tyrone 808 So. 2d 445 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Bailey 782 So. 2d 22 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Bartley 782 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Upchurch 783 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Dorsey 779 So. 2d 1008 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Lemons, 1999-2158 (La.4/20/00), ; (La.App.
State v. Weidenbacker 782 So. 2d 1040 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Hampton 782 So. 2d 1045 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Dennis 777 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Payne 777 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Jackson 778 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
the Louisiana Supreme Court held that when "there is a discrepancy between the minutes and the transcript, the transcript must prevail."
State v. Smith 769 So. 2d 1280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Wilkinson 772 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Short 769 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Broussard 769 So. 2d 1257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Sudds 769 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Chess 762 So. 2d 1279 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Barroso 762 So. 2d 206 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. May 760 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
the Louisiana Supreme Court held that when "there is a discrepancy between the minutes and the transcript, the transcript must prevail."
State v. Lemons 760 So. 2d 1152 La. 2000
State v. Stokes 759 So. 2d 980 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Snavely 759 So. 2d 950 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Joseph 759 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Robertson 756 So. 2d 1148 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
[7] State v. Haynes, 96-84 (La.App.
State v. Smith 757 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Plain 752 So. 2d 337 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Villarreal 759 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Norman 756 So. 2d 525 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. George 751 So. 2d 973 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Brown 750 So. 2d 262 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Dereyna 750 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
the Supreme Court held that when “there is a discrepancy between the minutes and the transcript, the transcript must prevail.” Therefore, we amend the minute entry and commitment to conform to the 2lh year sentence imposed by the trial judge on count two.
State v. Mayer 743 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Jackson 742 So. 2d 689 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Williams, 97-677 (La.App.
State v. Hollins 742 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Haynes, 96-84 (La.App.
State v. Graves 740 So. 2d 814 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Wilson 743 So. 2d 728 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Haynes, 96-84 (La.App.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by