Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lynch, 441 So. 2d 732.

883 citing documents.

State v. Suggs 81 So. 3d 815 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Ford 81 So. 3d 841 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Harrche 81 So. 3d 861 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Hernandez 82 So. 3d 327 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Jones 78 So. 3d 274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Alvarez 78 So. 3d 265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Douglas 80 So. 3d 571 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Leonard 80 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Ballew 78 So. 3d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Dickerson 80 So. 3d 510 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Proctor 80 So. 3d 527 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
State v. Saint-Vil 77 So. 3d 390 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Wilson 77 So. 3d 400 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
State v. Bush 77 So. 3d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Cummings 79 So. 3d 386 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Carter 75 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Fortenberry 73 So. 3d 391 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Ray 70 So. 3d 998 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
“Where there is discrepancy between the minutes and the transcript, the transcript will prevail.”
State v. Parker 71 So. 3d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Massey 71 So. 3d 367 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Smith 71 So. 3d 357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Declouet, supra.
State v. Cotton 67 So. 3d 673 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Suggs 70 So. 3d 60 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Nicholas 67 So. 3d 610 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Howard 66 So. 3d 1160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State Ex Rel. Sj 66 So. 3d 1142 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
State v. Caulfield 67 So. 3d 600 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Pettus 68 So. 3d 28 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
State ex rel. S.J. 66 So. 3d 1142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Wilson 69 So. 3d 598 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Speed, 43,786 (La.App.
State v. Stewart 65 So. 3d 771 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Mitchell 64 So. 3d 391 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Wells 64 So. 3d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Naquin 61 So. 3d 67 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Hyman 62 So. 3d 146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Lewis 61 So. 3d 78 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Payne 59 So. 3d 1287 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Ramsey 60 So. 3d 36 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Wilson 59 So. 3d 1259 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
where there is a discrepancy between the transcript and the minute entry or the commitment, the transcript prevails.
State v. Bazley 60 So. 3d 7 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Patterson 63 So. 3d 140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Pecot 54 So. 3d 1174 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Williams 54 So. 3d 98 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Thomas 54 So. 3d 688 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2010
State v. Thomas 54 So. 3d 678 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2010
State v. Bruce 54 So. 3d 87 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Declouet 52 So. 3d 89 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Stokes 50 So. 3d 884 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Davis 45 So. 3d 203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Alvarez 47 So. 3d 1018 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
and recognized that when there is a discrepancy between the minutes and the transcript, the transcript prevails.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by