DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 433 So. 2d 688.

1501 citing documents.

  • State v. Boyer 56 So. 3d 1119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Edwards 56 So. 3d 345 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Lathan, 41,855 (La.App.2d Cir.02/28/07), , writ denied, 2007-0805 (La.03/28/08), .
  • State v. Davis 57 So. 3d 1066 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Lathan, 41,855 (La.App.2d Cir.02/28/07), , writ denied, 2007-0805 (La.03/28/08), .
  • State v. Dillard 55 So. 3d 56 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Lathan, 41,855 (La.App.2d Cir.2/28/07), , writ denied.
  • State v. Horn 55 So. 3d 100 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Lathan, 41,-855 (La.App.2d Cir.2/28/07), , writ denied, 07-0805 (La.3/28/08), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Deanna Gaspard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    “[T]he trial judge need not articulate every aggravating and mitigating circumstance outlined in art. 894.1[;] the record must reflect that he adequately considered these guidelines in particularizing the sentence to the defendant.”
  • State v. Gaspard 49 So. 3d 971 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    “[T]he trial judge need not articulate every aggravating and mitigating circumstance outlined in art. 894.1 [;] the record must reflect that he adequately considered these guidelines in particularizing the sentence to the defendant.”
  • State v. JVF 47 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • State of Louisiana v. J. v. F. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    18 guidelines in particularizing the sentence to the defendant.” (citations omitted).
  • State of Louisiana v. H. A., Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    (citations omitted), “[w]hile the trial judge need not articulate every aggravating and mitigating circumstance outlined in art. 894.1, the record must reflect that he adequately considered these guidelines in particularizing the sentence to the defendant.” This does not mean, however, that the trial
  • State v. J.V.F. 47 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    art. 894.1[;] the record must reflect that he adequately considered these *12 | iaguidelines in particularizing the sentence to the defendant.” (citations omitted).
  • State v. HA, SR. 47 So. 3d 34 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    (citations omitted), “[wjhile the trial judge need not articulate every aggravating and mitigating circumstance outlined in art. 894.1, the record must reflect that he adequately considered these guidelines in particularizing the sentence to the defendant.” This does not mean, however, that the trial ju
  • State v. Foster 47 So. 3d 1078 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Lathan, 41,855 (La.App.2d Cir.2/28/07), writ denied, 07-0805 (La.3/28/08), .
  • State v. Blow 46 So. 3d 735 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Lathan, 41,855 (La.App.2d Cir.2/28/07), , writ denied, 2007-0805 (La.3/28/08), .
  • State v. Haltom 46 So. 3d 708 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Lathan, 41,855 (La.App.2d Cir.2/28/07), , writ denied, 2007-0805 (La.3/28/08), .
  • State v. Morris 46 So. 3d 774 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Lathan, 41,855 (La.App.2d Cir.2/28/07), , writ denied, 2007-0805 (La.3/28/08), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Rocky Bourg La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    “[T]he trial judge need not articulate every aggravating and mitigating circumstance outlined in art. 894.1[;] the record must reflect that he adequately considered these guidelines in particularizing the sentence to the defendant.”
  • State v. Bourg 42 So. 3d 1079 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    “[T]he trial judge need not articulate every aggravating and mitigating circumstance outlined in art. 894.1[;] the record must reflect that he adequately considered these guidelines in particularizing the sentence to the defendant.”
  • State v. Givens 42 So. 3d 451 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
  • State v. Robinson 42 So. 3d 1036 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Lathan, 41,-855 (La.App.2d Cir.2/28/07), , writ denied, 07-0805 (La.3/28/08), .
  • State v. Sims 41 So. 3d 1277 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Lathan, 41,855 (La.App.2d Cir.2/28/07), , writ, denied, 2007-0805 (La.3/28/08), .
  • State v. Givens 42 So. 3d 451 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Lathan, 41,855 (La.App.2d Cir.2/28/07), , writ denied, 2007-0805 (La.3/28/08), .
  • State v. Givens 41 So. 3d 589 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Lathan, 41,855 (La.App.2d Cir.2/28/07), , writ denied, 07-0805 (La.3/28/08), .
  • State v. Knight 36 So. 3d 1163 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Lathan, 41,855 (La.App.
  • State v. Vance 36 So. 3d 1152 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Lathan, 41,855 (La.App.2d Cir.2/28/07), , writ denied, 2007-0805 (La.3/28/08), .
  • State v. Drury 36 So. 3d 1150 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
  • State of Louisiana v. Anthony J. Rogers La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    “[T]he trial judge need not articulate every aggravating and mitigating circumstance outlined in art. 894.1[;] the record must reflect that he adequately considered these guidelines in particularizing the sentence to the defendant.”
  • State v. Eason 36 So. 3d 396 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Lathan, 41,855 (La.App.2d Cir.2/28/07), , writ denied, 2007-0805 (La.3/28/08), .
  • State v. Logan 34 So. 3d 528 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Lathan, 41,855 (La.App.2d Cir.2/28/07), , writ denied, 07-0805 (La.3/28/08), .
  • State v. Johnson 34 So. 3d 1124 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Lathan, 41,855 (La.App.2d Cir.2/28/07), , writ denied, 2007-0805 (La.3/28/08), .
  • State v. Morgan 34 So. 3d 1127 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
  • State of Louisiana v. Kendall Paul Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • State v. Davis 36 So. 3d 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Dyas 32 So. 3d 364 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
  • State v. Little 30 So. 3d 286 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
  • State v. Cooper 32 So. 3d 351 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Dunn, 30,767 (La.App.2d Cir.6/24/98), .
  • State v. Davidson 32 So. 3d 290 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Lathan, 41,855 (La.App.
  • State v. Burns 32 So. 3d 261 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Lathan, 41,855 (La.App.
  • State v. Stutts 26 So. 3d 320 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
  • State v. Allen 30 So. 3d 1049 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    4 State v. Lathan, 41,855 (La.App.
  • State v. McKEAVER 32 So. 3d 909 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Lathan, 41,855 (La.App.2d Cir.02/28/07), , writ denied, 2007-0805 (La.03/28/08), .
  • State v. Holden 30 So. 3d 1053 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Lathan, 41,855 (La.App.
  • State v. Autry 30 So. 3d 1068 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Lathan, 41,855 (La.App.2d Cir.2/28/07), , writ denied, 07-0805 (La.3/28/08), .
  • State v. Wallace 31 So. 3d 557 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Lathan, 41,855 (La.App.2d Cir.2/28/07), , writ denied, 2007-0805 *559 (La.3/28/08), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Willie J. Beaudion La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    “[T]he trial judge need not articulate every aggravating and mitigating circumstance -9- outlined in art. 894.1[;] the record must reflect that he adequately considered these guidelines in particularizing the sentence to the defendant.”
  • State v. Beaudion 27 So. 3d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    “[T]he trial judge need not articulate every aggravating and mitigating circumstance 110outlined in art. 894.1[;] the record must reflect that he adequately considered these guidelines in particularizing the sentence to the defendant.”
  • State v. JANISE 25 So. 3d 255 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • State of Louisiana v. Steve Joseph Janise La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    “[T]he trial judge need not articulate every aggravating and mitigating circumstance outlined in art. 894.1[;] the record must reflect that he adequately considered these guidelines in particularizing the sentence to the defendant.”
  • State of Louisiana v. Ricky N. Nolen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    “[T]he trial judge need not articulate every aggravating and mitigating circumstance outlined in art. 894.1[;] the record must reflect that he adequately considered these guidelines in particularizing the sentence to the defendant.”
  • State of Louisiana v. David Markale Batiste A/K/A/ David M. Batiste La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    “[T]he trial judge need not articulate every aggravating and mitigating circumstance outlined in art. 894.1[;] the record must reflect that he adequately considered these guidelines in particularizing the sentence to the defendant.”