Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Brogdon, 457 So. 2d 616.

237 citing documents.

State v. Armstead 542 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Foster 541 So. 2d 238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
A sentence which appears to be severe is considered excessive and unconstitutional if it is “grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime” or “is nothing more than the purposeless and needless imposition of pain and suffering.” cert.
State v. Jackson 540 So. 2d 533 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. White 538 So. 2d 1043 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Gilbert 535 So. 2d 1313 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
A sentence is excessive if “grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime” or “nothing more than the purposeless and needless imposition of pain and suffering.” cert.
State v. Reed 536 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Tassin 536 So. 2d 402 La. 1988
State v. Williams 532 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
The imposition of a sentence, although within the statutory limit, may be unconstitutionally excessive if it is “grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime” or “is nothing more than the purposeless imposition of pain and suffering.” cert.
State v. Bouie 532 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
State v. Studivant 531 So. 2d 539 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Clark 529 So. 2d 1353 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Lee 524 So. 2d 1176 La. 1988
that "[t]his court is required by our state constitution and its own rule in each capital sentence review to conduct a comparative proportionality review to determine whether the sentence is disproportionate to the penalty imposed in similar cases, considering both the crime and the defendant."
State v. Wilson 526 So. 2d 348 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
State v. Guillot 526 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
(La.1984), cert den., Brogdon v. Louisiana, 471 U.S. 1111 , 105 S.Ct.
State v. Dean 528 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Shelton 523 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
certiorari denied Brogdon v. Louisiana, 471 U.S. 1111 , 105 S.Ct.
State v. Newsome 524 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Eaton 524 So. 2d 1194 La. 1988
State v. Copeland 530 So. 2d 526 La. 1988
State v. Grey 522 So. 2d 1216 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
State v. Hoskins 522 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Roberts 522 So. 2d 1237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
A sentence within the statutory limit would be constitutionally excessive if it is “grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime” or “is nothing more than the purposeless and needless imposition of pain and suffering.” cert.
State v. Jordan 522 So. 2d 1179 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
State v. Collins 521 So. 2d 846 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Brock 521 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Bryant 521 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
A sentence, although within statutory limits, may nonetheless be unconstitutionally excessive if it is “grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime” or “is nothing more than a purposeless and needless imposition of pain and suffering.” cert.
State v. Selders 520 So. 2d 1227 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Smith 519 So. 2d 829 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
certiorari denied Brogdon v. Louisiana, 471 U.S. 1111 , 105 S.Ct.
State v. Franklin 519 So. 2d 292 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Nicholas 519 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
15:529.-lA(3)(a)), we cannot find that the sentence actually imposed is grossly disproportionate or constitutes a “purposeless imposition of pain and suffering.” cert.
State v. Anderson 517 So. 2d 1231 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Angulo 517 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
certiorari denied Brogdon v. Louisiana, 471 U.S. 1111 , 105 S.Ct.
State v. Thompson 516 So. 2d 349 La. 1987
that "[t]his court is required by our state constitution and its own rule in each capital sentence review to conduct a comparative proportionality review to determine whether the sentence is disproportionate to the penalty imposed in similar cases, considering both the crime and the defendant."
State v. Perez 516 So. 2d 199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Smith 516 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Gonzales 515 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Hupp 514 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Berthelot 513 So. 2d 1228 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Chiles 514 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
The imposition of a sentence, although within the statutory limit, may be unconstitutionally excessive if it is “grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime” or “is nothing more than the purposeless and needless imposition of pain and suffering.” cert.
State v. Kelson 513 So. 2d 388 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Kyles 513 So. 2d 265 La. 1987
State v. Puerto 513 So. 2d 320 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Monroe 513 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
The imposition of a sentence, although within the statutory limit, may be unconstitutionally excessive if it is “grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime” or “is nothing more than the purposeless and needless imposition of pain and suffering.” ce rt.
State v. Smith 511 So. 2d 852 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Francosi 511 So. 2d 1181 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Cupit 508 So. 2d 996 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
939 , 83 L.Ed.2d 952 (1985); cert.
State v. Bunch 510 So. 2d 1266 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Falls 508 So. 2d 1021 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Tatum 506 So. 2d 584 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Vanvorst 505 So. 2d 123 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987