Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Benoit, 440 So. 2d 129.
-
State v. Raiford
846 So. 2d 913
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
310 , 136 L.Ed.2d 227 (1996)
-
State v. Pugh
831 So. 2d 341
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
310 , 136 L.Ed.2d 227 (1996)
- State v. Murray 827 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
- State v. Johnson 821 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
- State v. Nightengale 818 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
- State v. Porter 806 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
- State v. Franklin 803 So. 2d 1057 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
- State v. Jeselink 799 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
- Scott v. American Tobacco Co. 795 So. 2d 1176 La. 2001
- State v. Porche 780 So. 2d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
- State v. Ouzts 777 So. 2d 1286 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
-
State v. Carter
767 So. 2d 839
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
he asserts that defendant must be able to understand the rights and to willingly give a statement.
- State v. Sam 761 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
- State v. Roddy 756 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
- State v. Coleman 756 So. 2d 1218 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
- State v. Maise 759 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
- State v. East 745 So. 2d 812 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
- State v. Brown 715 So. 2d 96 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
-
State v. Fisher
692 So. 2d 713
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966); State v. Chevalier, supra .
- State v. Neese 691 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
- State v. Borne 691 So. 2d 1281 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
- State v. Walker 681 So. 2d 1023 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
-
State v. Pittman
683 So. 2d 748
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
State v. Simmons, supra.
- State v. Matthews 679 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
- State v. Smith 677 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
- State v. Billiot 672 So. 2d 361 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
-
State v. Smith
668 So. 2d 1260
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
State v. Weiland, supra ; (La.App.
- State v. Simmons 663 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
- State v. Maize 655 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
- State v. Glynn 653 So. 2d 1288 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
- State v. Freeman 653 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
-
State v. Dunn
651 So. 2d 1378
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
State v. Pittman, supra.
- State v. Brooks 648 So. 2d 366 La. 1995
- State v. Hamilton 648 So. 2d 939 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
-
State v. Guidry
647 So. 2d 502
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
[1] the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: "Before the state may introduce a confession into evidence, it must be affirmatively shown that it was freely and voluntarily given.
-
State v. Smith
638 So. 2d 452
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
State v. Weiland, supra; (La.App.
- State v. Guidry 635 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
-
State v. Van Winkle
635 So. 2d 1177
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
State v. Pittman, supra.
- State v. Stewart 633 So. 2d 925 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
- State v. Fisher 626 So. 2d 548 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
- State v. Parker 625 So. 2d 1364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
- State v. Lockhart 629 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
-
State v. Watkins
625 So. 2d 507
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
State v. Toups, [ (La.App.
- State v. Medine 623 So. 2d 110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
- State v. Crawford 619 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
-
State v. Smith
618 So. 2d 419
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Weiland, supra.
-
State v. Leeming
612 So. 2d 308
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
State v. Weiland, supra; (La.App.
- State v. Dailey 607 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
- State v. Martin 607 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
-
State v. Leonard
605 So. 2d 697
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. English, supra .