Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Brown, 434 So. 2d 399.

20 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Matt Mason, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
(rejecting defendant’s alternative argument regarding the denial of his motion to suppress because he had not raised the issue at trial); State v. Johnson, 07–1040 (La.App.
State of Louisiana Versus Alexsy Mejia La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
656, 178 L.Ed.2d 513 (2010); (La.
State Of Louisiana v. David Brown La. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Roosevelt T. Ardison La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana Versus Eric Richardson La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
2/10/12), (holding defendant waived the argument that evidence should be suppressed because the search exceeded the scope of the search warrant when the defense counsel never asked the trial judge to rule on the “constitutionally overbroad” issue asserted for the first time on appeal); (La.
State v. Marx 163 So. 3d 44 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
(a defendant may not raise new grounds for suppressing evidence on appeal that he did not raise at the trial court in a motion to suppress); see also State v. Montejo, 2006-1807, pp. 21-26 (La.5/11/10), -970 (a defendant must object to the admission of a confession by the filing of a motion a
State of Louisiana v. Jean-Luc Arisme La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
(rejecting defendant‟s alternative argument regarding the denial of his motion to suppress because he had not raised the issue at trial); State v. Johnson, 07-1040 (La.App.
State v. Arisme 123 So. 3d 1259 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
(rejecting defendant’s alternative argument regarding the denial of his motion to suppress because he had not raised the issue at trial); State v. Johnson, 07-1040 (La.App.
State v. Coleman 121 So. 3d 703 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State v. Brown, *710 State v. Sinclair, 45,625 (La.App.2d Cir.11/3/10), , writ denied, 10-2718 (La.4/29/11), .
State v. Berroa-Reyes 109 So. 3d 487 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
5 Cir. 8/30/11), , writ denied, 2011-2060 (La.2/10/12), (holding defendant waived the argument that evidence should be suppressed because the search exceeded the scope of the search warrant when the defense counsel never asked the trial judge to rule on the “constitutionally overbroad” issue asserted for the first time on appeal); (rejecting defendant’s alternative argument regarding the denial of his motion to suppress because he had not raised the issue at trial); State v. Johnson, 07-1040, p.
State v. Ardoin 58 So. 3d 1025 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
(rejecting defendant’s alternative argument regarding the denial of his motion to suppress because he had not raised the issue at trial); State v. Johnson, 07-1040 (La.
State v. Sinclair 55 So. 3d 47 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Montejo 40 So. 3d 952 La. 2010
(rejecting defendant’s alternative argument regarding the denial of his motion to suppress because he had not raised the issue at trial); State v. Johnson, 07-1040 (La.App.
State v. Robinson 874 So. 2d 66 La. 2004
1232 , 51 L.Ed.2d 424 (1977)
State of Louisiana v. John R. Chesson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Chesson 856 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Pierre 614 So. 2d 1309 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
However, the Louisiana Supreme Court distinguished the Henry case on the basis that in Henry the defendant made incriminating statements to a fellow prisoner who was acting under instructions as a paid informant for the government.
State v. Hill 601 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Romero 552 So. 2d 45 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
[sic] And in State versus Brown, a Louisiana Supreme Court 1983 decision, found at .
State v. Wascom 524 So. 2d 1342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988