DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Pike, 426 So. 2d 1329.

29 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Patrick Michael Shelvin AKA - Patrick Shelvin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    Conversely, the supreme court affirmed defendant’s conviction for simple burglary of an inhabited dwelling.
  • State v. Shelvin 181 So. 3d 879 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Conversely, the supreme court affirmed defendant’s conviction for simple burglary of an inhabited dwelling.
  • State v. Netter 79 So. 3d 478 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Davenport , 08-463 at 9, 2 So.3d at 450
  • State v. Wiltz 28 So. 3d 554 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    The Supreme Court has also stated that “[i]f the judge records the factors affecting his sentencing decision, the sentence should not be set aside as excessive unless it is grossly disproportionate to the offense or represents nothing more than the needless infliction of pain and suffering.”
  • State v. Davenport 2 So. 3d 445 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State v. Stovall 977 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
  • State v. Martin 970 So. 2d 9 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
  • Distinguished State v. Butler 948 So. 2d 296 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    cited by the defendant in support of his argument.
  • State v. Gauthier 941 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
  • State v. Stanton 929 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
  • State v. Scott 913 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
  • State v. Jones 880 So. 2d 962 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Newman 879 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    The Supreme Court has also stated that “[i]f the judge records the factors affecting his sentencing decision, the sentence should not be set aside as excessive unless it is grossly disproportionate to the offense or represents nothing more than the needless infliction of pain and suffering.”
  • State v. Lewis 876 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    In the instant case the trial court judge adequately complied with the statutory sentencing guidelines under La.C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Dempsey 844 So. 2d 1037 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Cooley 747 So. 2d 1182 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Tran 709 So. 2d 311 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    State v. Page, 96-227 (La.
  • State v. Peterson 623 So. 2d 919 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
  • State v. Moses 615 So. 2d 1030 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • State v. Green 558 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • State v. Richardson 547 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
  • State v. Ray 547 So. 2d 1350 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Robinson 544 So. 2d 444 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
  • State v. McLean 525 So. 2d 1251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Torres 470 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
    State v. Lockhart, supra
  • State v. Smith 463 So. 2d 16 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
    The following cases illustrate cases where specific intent was found necessary for a burglary conviction, although nothing was taken: (La.App.
  • State v. Coats 449 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Johnson 442 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Jacobs 435 So. 2d 1014 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    where a conviction of simple burglary of an inhabited dwelling was affirmed.