Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 437 So. 2d 802.

19 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Xavier Watson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
As we have explained: “The critical question in cases involving a witness’s juvenile record and the sixth amendment right to confrontation is whether the defendant will be precluded from utilizing a method of impeachment that would be effective in the circumstances of his case were the juvenile record available to defendant.”
State of Louisiana v. Robert Glen Coleman 188 So. 3d 174 La. 2016
State v. Henderson 136 So. 3d 223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
03-1680, pp. 1-2 (La.6/27/08), , wherein the Court stated: “The critical question in cases involving a witness’s juvenile record and the sixth amendment right to confrontation is whether the defendant will be precluded from utilizing a method of impeachment that would be effective in the circumstances of his case were the juvenile record available to defendant.”
State v. Rubens 83 So. 3d 30 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
1105, 1112 , 39 L.Ed.2d 347 (1974)
State v. Nguyen 888 So. 2d 900 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
1105, 1112 , 39 L.Ed.2d 347 *912 (1974)
State v. Perkins 852 So. 2d 989 La. 2003
As we have explained: “The *990 critical question in cases involving a witness’s juvenile record and the sixth amendment right to confrontation is whether the defendant will be precluded from utilizing a method of impeachment that would be effective in the circumstances of his case were the juvenile record available to defendant.”
State v. Allen 682 So. 2d 713 La. 1996
2906 , 90 L.Ed.2d 992 (1986); (La.
State v. Tassin 536 So. 2d 402 La. 1988
State v. Jenkins 508 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Banks 503 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. James 499 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
State v. Isaac 487 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
224 , 83 L.Ed.2d 154 (1984); (La.App.
State v. Robins 484 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
the defendant wished to use a state witness’s juvenile records to impeach her.
State v. Jones 474 So. 2d 919 La. 1985
State v. Wilson 467 So. 2d 503 La. 1985
State v. Wingo 457 So. 2d 1159 La. 1984
This same sort of "evidence"
State v. Morgan 454 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
which states: "When a defendant moves for production of the juvenile records of a witness the trial court is called upon to determine *368 whether the impeachment value of these adjudications is outweighed by the state's interest in maintaining the confidentiality of juvenile records."
State v. Stevenson 447 So. 2d 1125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Cook 446 So. 2d 824 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984