Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Mitchell, 437 So. 2d 264.

35 citing documents.

State v. Shirley 10 So. 3d 224 La. 2009
-652 (La.1984); -1167 (La.1981), dissent at ; cert.
State v. Manning 885 So. 2d 1044 La. 2004
-652 (La.1984); -1167 (La.1981), dissent at ; cert.
State v. Barthe 806 So. 2d 53 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Green 613 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
State v. Harper 548 So. 2d 1281 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Holland 544 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Jackson 523 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Brown 522 So. 2d 1110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Grant 517 So. 2d 1151 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Walters 514 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Price 517 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
wherein the court stated: “The res gestae consists of events speaking for themselves under the immediate pressure of the occurrence, through the spontaneous words and acts of the participants.
State v. Lambert 506 So. 2d 1384 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Delatte 506 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Burns 504 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Bates 501 So. 2d 950 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Intoxication will render an incul-patory statement inadmissible only where the intoxication is of such a degree that the defendant’s ability to comprehend the consequences of his statement has been negat *954 (La.App.
State v. Wille 496 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Shelton 490 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Williams 489 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Such a ruling would require that the police administer Miranda warnings to all persons whom they question as to potential breaches of the law, even where the officers are in the preliminary investigatory process of determining whether any crime has indeed been committed, (citations ommit-ted)
State v. Williams 489 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Price 482 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Lee 482 So. 2d 194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Lee's response, moreover, came at the time when Officer Bryson was not investigating a particular crime but “was in the preliminary process of determining whether a crime had been committed.” (La.
State v. Bourg 470 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Wilson 469 So. 2d 1087 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Holmes 467 So. 2d 1177 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Patterson 464 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Our Supreme Court, stated: *814 .
State v. Robertson 464 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
1964 , 44 L.Ed.2d 459 (1975)
State v. Campbell 461 So. 2d 644 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Broaden 461 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Loyd 455 So. 2d 687 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Jackson 452 So. 2d 1250 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
stated that where no finger of suspicion has been pointed at a defendant and where he is not the focus of an investigation of a particular crime, the court is unwilling to curtail the ability of the police to investigate potential criminal activity.
State v. Bailey 452 So. 2d 756 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
described the res gestae exception: "The res gestae consists of events speaking for themselves under the immediate pressure of the occurrence, through the spontaneous words and acts of the participants.
State v. Moran 451 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Davis 448 So. 2d 645 La. 1984
State v. Pelt 448 So. 2d 1294 La. 1984
State v. Tullos 446 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
the court noted that the trial court had properly analyzed the totality of the circumstances in the case in its determination that the defendant’s confession was freely and voluntarily given.