Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Moore, 432 So. 2d 209.
-
State v. Williams
449 So. 2d 60
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
1981); if the prosecution is able to lay an adequate foundation independent of the suggestive events the identification is properly admitted
- State v. Rivers 444 So. 2d 1384 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
-
State v. Goutro
444 So. 2d 615
La. 1984
see also People v. Hughes , above.
-
State v. Rault
445 So. 2d 1203
La. 1984
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
- State v. Sweeney 443 So. 2d 522 La. 1983
-
State ex rel. Nelson
442 So. 2d 729
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
-
State v. Rodrigue
441 So. 2d 1274
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.
- State v. Howard 441 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Williams 438 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
-
State v. Chism
436 So. 2d 464
La. 1983
In adopting this view as my own, I expressly abandon the contrary view I
- State v. Sutton 436 So. 2d 471 La. 1983