Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Moore, 432 So. 2d 209.

61 citing documents.

  • State v. Williams 449 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
    1981); if the prosecution is able to lay an adequate foundation independent of the suggestive events the identification is properly admitted
  • State v. Rivers 444 So. 2d 1384 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Goutro 444 So. 2d 615 La. 1984
    see also People v. Hughes , above.
  • State v. Rault 445 So. 2d 1203 La. 1984
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Sweeney 443 So. 2d 522 La. 1983
  • State ex rel. Nelson 442 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Rodrigue 441 So. 2d 1274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.
  • State v. Howard 441 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Williams 438 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Chism 436 So. 2d 464 La. 1983
    In adopting this view as my own, I expressly abandon the contrary view I
  • State v. Sutton 436 So. 2d 471 La. 1983