Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Moore, 440 So. 2d 134.

22 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Reginald Ruffins La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
denied, 555 U.S. 824, 129 S. Ct. 143, 172 L. Ed. 2d 93 (2008); (La.
State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Jones La. 2019
State of Louisiana v. John Drummer, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Lee, 05-2098, p. 44 (La.1/16/08)
State v. Drummer 245 So. 3d 93 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1/16/08), , 139 ; , 137 (La.1983).
State of Louisiana v. Ted Dwayne Stevens, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Lee, 05-2098 at p. 44, 976 So.2d at 139
State v. Stevens 140 So. 3d 1267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Lee , 05-2098 at p. 44, 976 So.2d at 139
State v. Altenberger 139 So. 3d 510 La. 2014
State v. Lee, 05-2098, p. 44 (La.1/16/08)
State v. Garcia 108 So. 3d 1 La. 2012
Lee , 05-2098 at p. 44, 976 So.2d at 139
State v. Williams 85 So. 3d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Rose 949 So. 2d 1236 La. 2007
State v. Hills, 99-1750, p. 6 (La.5/16/00)
State v. Rose 925 So. 2d 34 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
State v. Brown 782 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
("Evidence of other crimes may be admitted when the prior crime by the particular defendant is so distinctively similar to the charged crime (especially in terms of time, place and manner of commission) that one may reasonably infer that the same person was the perpetrator."); see also State v. Evans, 9
State v. Bell 776 So. 2d 418 La. 2000
State v. Hills 761 So. 2d 516 La. 2000
State v. Pollard 760 So. 2d 362 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
opined that: Evidence of other crimes is inadmissible when the only purpose of the evidence is to show the defendant's propensity to violate the criminal laws since the relevancy of such evidence for the purpose of showing that the defendant was the perpetrator is so marginal that its probative value is heav
State v. Evans 746 So. 2d 1265 La. 1999
(“Evidence of other crimes may be admitted when the prior crime by the particular defendant is so distinctively similar to the charged crime (especially in terms of time, place and manner of commission) that one may reasonably infer that the same person was the perpetrator.”); see also State v. Evans, 9
State v. Carr 620 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
deals with of evidence of other crimes having almost the identical modus operandi or system and committed in close proximity in time and place.
State v. Brooks 541 So. 2d 801 La. 1989
State v. Robinson 480 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
****** “ State v. Kahey, and State v. Hatcher, [ ], set forth guidelines for determining the admissibility of other crimes evidence.
State v. O'NEAL 478 So. 2d 1311 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Johnson 458 So. 2d 937 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
sets forth guidelines for determining when other crimes evidence has "substantial relevancy" that qualifies it for admission as an exception to the exclusionary rule.
State v. Baker 452 So. 2d 737 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Kahey and State v. Hatcher , set forth guidelines for determining the admissibility of other crimes evidence.