Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Williams, 445 So. 2d 1171.

155 citing documents.

State v. Ritchie 556 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Collins 557 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
State v. Johnson 553 So. 2d 953 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Willis 552 So. 2d 39 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. White 552 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Jackson 552 So. 2d 445 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Avila 550 So. 2d 1374 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
State v. Washington 550 So. 2d 287 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Deboue 552 So. 2d 355 La. 1989
-81 (La.1984); State v. Monroe, supra .
State v. Floyd 544 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Bell 543 So. 2d 965 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Smith 539 So. 2d 993 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Tassin 536 So. 2d 402 La. 1988
State v. Lee 533 So. 2d 399 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Lott 535 So. 2d 963 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Bruno 526 So. 2d 1287 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
the court concluded that the defense should have been allowed to develop the personal bias of an investigating detective which could influence his veracity.
State v. Copeland 530 So. 2d 526 La. 1988
State v. Morris 521 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Lighten 516 So. 2d 1266 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Thompson 516 So. 2d 349 La. 1987
State v. Anderson 517 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Heath 513 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Duvio 511 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Gaudin 508 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Mills 505 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Mims 505 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Smith 504 So. 2d 1070 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Lester, supra .
State v. Parker 503 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Montgomery 499 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
State v. Caminita 499 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Piazza 496 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Piazza 496 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
State v. Batista 496 So. 2d 1165 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Jacobs 493 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Gaudin 493 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
State v. Thompson 489 So. 2d 1364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Wagster 489 So. 2d 1299 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
the Louisiana Supreme Court noted that, in requiring a prima facie showing of systematic exclusion of blacks over a period of time, "the defendant is saddled with a difficult burden."
State v. Ford 489 So. 2d 1250 La. 1986
State v. Cook 485 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Roux 487 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
State v. Robinson 485 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
403 So.2d at 680 (emphasis added)
State v. Williams 483 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Then, the Supreme Court stated: “The prior inconsistent testimony is relevant only to the witness’ credibility and is not to be used as substantive evidence of the defendant’s guilt.
State v. Lester 482 So. 2d 15 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Hamilton 481 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Brown 478 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Tomlin 478 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
135 , 66 L.Ed.2d 58 ; (La.
State v. Bell 477 So. 2d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Hookfin 476 So. 2d 481 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Denstell 476 So. 2d 931 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
However, (1984): “While it is true that as a general rule sentences served for crimes arising out of a single course of conduct are served concurrently instead of consecutively, this court has never held that consecutive sentences are necessarily excessive.
State v. Pruitt 474 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985