DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Foy, 439 So. 2d 433.

49 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana Versus Philip Bridgewater La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
    App. 5 Cir. 4/29/03), (La.
  • Anthony Woods v. French Market Corporation La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
    See Uniform Rules, Courts of Appeal, Rule 2-12.4(B)(4) 2; n. 1 (La.1983); Bell v. Dep't of Police, 13-1529, pp. 6-7 n. 4 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Joshua Babineaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
  • State of Louisiana Versus Elvin D. Villafranca La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
    “Understanding, not age, is the test of competency for any witness.” (La.
  • Maqubool v. Sewerage & Water Bd. of New Orleans 259 So. 3d 630 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    Bell v. Dep't of Police , 2013-1529 (La.App.
  • State v. Luckey 212 So. 3d 1220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    “Understanding, not age, is the test of competency for any witness.” (La.
  • State v. Chester 165 So. 3d 1006 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    “Understanding, not age, is the test of competency for any witness.” State v. Pierce, 11-320 (La.App.
  • Bell v. Department of Police 141 So. 3d 871 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Uniform Rules, Courts of Appeal, Rule 2-12.4(B)(4) (“All assignments of error and issues for review must be briefed.
  • State in the Interest of N. F. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    State v. Troulliet, supra.
  • State ex rel. N.F. 124 So. 3d 1262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Troulliet, supra.
  • State of Louisiana v. Thomas Kirk Gaton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Gaddis 973 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    App. 5 Cir. 4/29/03), , which recognized that memory lapse and alleged inconsistencies may have resulted from the child-victim's tender age—5-years-old— on the date of the incident; the traumatic nature of the experience; exposure to unfamiliar surroundings; or the method of interrogation
  • State v. Simmons 845 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Deutor 842 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    State v. Troulliet, supra.
  • Greene v. Taylor 809 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    State v. Linson, 94-0061 (La.App.
  • State v. Gaal 800 So. 2d 938 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
  • State v. King 782 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Moore 777 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Newman 769 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • State v. Randle 750 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Cedrington 725 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Carter 713 So. 2d 796 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Henry 709 So. 2d 322 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    State v. Stowe, 93-2020 (La.4/11/94)
  • State v. Lee 668 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Hopkins 663 So. 2d 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • State v. Maize 655 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • State v. Allen 647 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
  • State v. Troulliet 643 So. 2d 1267 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Stewart 641 So. 2d 1086 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
  • State v. Ford 608 So. 2d 1058 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    -437 (La.1983); State v. Richardson, 459 So.2d at 36 .
  • State v. Sago 591 So. 2d 1356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State v. Velez 588 So. 2d 116 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
    the trial judge instructed the jury that as the sole judges of the weight and credibility of witnesses, they should scrutinize the circumstances under which the witnesses testified, their manner while testifying, and their ability and opportunity to remember.
  • State v. Bean 582 So. 2d 947 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Stukes 552 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Isaac 544 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
    State v. Thompson, supra
  • State v. Waller 519 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Murphy 515 So. 2d 558 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Mims 501 So. 2d 962 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    State v. Richey, 258 La.
  • State v. Williams 497 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    See State v. Helsley, supra; (La.
  • State v. Hobdy 494 So. 2d 1321 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Nash 494 So. 2d 1329 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    1 State v. Humphrey, 412 So.2d *1332 507 (La.1982)
  • State v. Glenn 493 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Jacobs 493 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Minnifield 475 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    1st Cir.1983); State v. Foy
  • State v. Patterson 473 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Murphy 465 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Richardson 459 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Casimier 454 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    The Louisiana Supreme Court has long held that the trial judge's determination of the competency of a witness is entitled to great weight on review because the judge has the opportunity to see and hear the witness, and such finding of competency should not be disturbed absent a showing of manifest error.
  • State v. Robinson 441 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    2781, 2789 , 61 L.Ed.2d *367 560, 573 (1979); (1983); at 1102