Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Thomas, 447 So. 2d 1053.

72 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Keith Joseph Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2026
    “The property taken in a robbery must be sufficiently under the victim’s control that, absent violence or intimidation, the victim could have prevented the taking.” Defendant here asserts two arguments in support of his sufficiency-of-the- evidence challenge.
  • State of Louisiana v. Arnold Ray Goudeau La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
  • State v. Metoyer 266 So. 3d 943 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
  • State v. Broussard 149 So. 3d 446 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    State v. Long, supra; State v. Toney, supra.
  • State ex rel. T.W. 141 So. 3d 822 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2014
  • State v. Santos-Castro 120 So. 3d 933 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    “The property taken in a robbery must be sufficiently under the victim’s control that, absent violence or intimidation, the victim could have prevented the taking.”
  • State v. Davis 111 So. 3d 100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Johnson 60 So. 3d 43 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Hall 986 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Long, 36,167 (La.App.
  • State v. Rubin 899 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State of Louisiana v. Jordie Kenry Rubin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    “The property taken in a robbery must be sufficiently under the victim's control that, absent violence or intimidation, the victim could have prevented the taking.”
  • State v. Boss 848 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    [3] State v. Long 36,167 (La.App.
  • State v. Jones 840 So. 2d 7 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Long 830 So. 2d 552 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Toney, supra ; (La.App.
  • State v. Washington 828 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Toney, 26,711 (La.App.2d Cir.03/01/95), .
  • State v. Washington 828 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Toney, 26,711 (La.App.2d Cir.03/01/95), .
  • State v. Lacey 669 So. 2d 1303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • State v. Toney 651 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Ruiz 630 So. 2d 897 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
  • State v. Myers 610 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • State v. Russell 607 So. 2d 689 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
    The Louisiana Supreme Court, found that "[t]he offense of theft is a crime against property, whereas robbery is an offense against the person; the latter has a harsher penalty:" "It is the increased risk of danger to human life caused when a theft is attempted in the face of the victim's opposition that caused the legislature to
  • State v. Hill 598 So. 2d 1269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • State v. Roberts 588 So. 2d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State v. Powell 566 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    2 If a sentence falls within the permissible punishment provided under the statute, as it does in the instant case, it may still violate Article I, Section 20 of the Louisiana Constitution of 1974 which prohibits “cruel, excessive or unusual punishment.”
  • State v. Greer 553 So. 2d 892 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
  • State v. Mallett 552 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Kanupp 552 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Alexander 550 So. 2d 207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. James 545 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
  • State v. Armstead 542 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
  • State v. Foster 541 So. 2d 238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Gleason 533 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Williams 532 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Bouie 532 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Wilson 526 So. 2d 348 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Roberts 522 So. 2d 1237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Brock 521 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Anderson 517 So. 2d 1231 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Haywood 516 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Smith 516 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Michaels 516 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
    1985); State v. Sepulvado, 367 So.
  • State v. Trahan 520 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Nora 520 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Chiles 514 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Monroe 513 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Anderson 511 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Edouard 512 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Francosi 511 So. 2d 1181 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Jeffers 511 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Howard 511 So. 2d 11 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987