DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Nuccio, 454 So. 2d 93.

200 citing documents.

  • State v. Scott 823 So. 2d 960 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Mitchell 808 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Anderson 784 So. 2d 666 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Harris 782 So. 2d 1055 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Hopkins 774 So. 2d 1178 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    (La.1984); State v. Baum, 95-0384 (La.App.3d Cir.10/4/95), , writ denied, 95-2685 (La.2/9/96), .
  • State v. Weaver 775 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Casse 772 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    104 *804 (La.1984); State v. Pertuit, 98-1264 (La.
  • State v. Boyette 768 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969)
  • State v. Everett 770 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Coleman 762 So. 2d 1134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • State v. Guzman 769 So. 2d 1158 La. 2000
    (holding that the scope of Boykin has not been expanded to include advising the defendant of the possible consequences of his actions or that his conviction may be used as a basis for the filing of a future multiple offender bill).
  • State v. Phillips 762 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    State v. Baum, 95-0384 (La.App.
  • State v. White 756 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Baum, 95-0384 (La.App.
  • State v. Johnson 750 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Madison, 32,432 (La.App.2d Cir.10/27/99), ; (La.
  • State v. Johnson 750 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Baum, 95-384 (La.App.
  • State v. Boles 750 So. 2d 1059 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Flanagan 744 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
  • State v. Madison 743 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
  • State v. Pickett 746 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Ngo 738 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    -05 (La.1984), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: |40ur jurisprudence has never required that a defendant be informed that his guilty plea — his conviction- — may be used as a basis for the filing of a future multiple offender bill.
  • State v. Youngblood 740 So. 2d 687 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
  • State v. Kunzman 741 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    Boykin, supra ; (La.App.
  • State v. Pertuit 734 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    State v. Dejean, 94-459 (La.App.
  • State v. Jackson 734 So. 2d 54 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
  • State v. Anderson 732 So. 2d 517 La. 1999
    State v. Baum, 95-0384 (La.App.
  • State v. Looney 728 So. 2d 987 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969)
  • State v. McKinney 728 So. 2d 1009 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    State v. Gay, 29,434 (La.App.
  • State v. Smith 722 So. 2d 1048 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    104 *1049 (La.1984); (La.App.
  • State v. Anderson 720 So. 2d 355 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    ( upon which the majority heavily relies).
  • State v. Ursin 720 So. 2d 1248 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    State v. Dejean, 94-459 (La.App.
  • State v. Hill 714 So. 2d 814 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    Kennedy v. Maggio, 725 F.2d 269 (5 Cir.1984).
  • State v. Hayes 712 So. 2d 1019 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
  • State v. Johnson 713 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Nicholas 704 So. 2d 930 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969)
  • State v. McGee 698 So. 2d 69 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    our supreme court stated: Boykin, furthermore, only requires that a defendant be informed of the three rights enumerated above.
  • State v. Gay 697 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    the Louisiana Supreme Court said: This court has held that a police officer's unsolicited, unresponsive reference to another crime alleged to have been committed by a defendant is not the comment of a court official under C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Jones 691 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    the court quoted that "Its (Boykin) scope has not been expanded to include advising defendant of any other rights which he may have, nor of the possible consequences of his actions ...
  • State v. Lott 688 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    State v. Deroche, supra .
  • State v. Bishop 686 So. 2d 1053 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
    Because a guilty plea will not be considered valid unless the plea is a free and voluntary choice on the part of the defendant, the defendant should be afforded the option of entering a plea of guilty to the all three offenses and being sentenced within the limits of the plea agreement, or of withdrawing his guilty plea and proceeding to trial on the charges.
  • State v. Ard 686 So. 2d 1026 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • State v. Matthews 679 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Miskell 676 So. 2d 1092 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • State v. Kelly 677 So. 2d 495 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Deroche 674 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • State v. Fritcher 672 So. 2d 295 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • State v. Morgan 671 So. 2d 998 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Hidalgo 668 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Dejean 694 So. 2d 284 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Johnson 664 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • State v. Baum 663 So. 2d 285 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995