DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sweeney, 443 So. 2d 522.

210 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana in the Interest of J.H.. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
    App. 4 Cir. 12/4/13), ( (La.
  • State v. Priest 265 So. 3d 993 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    2252 , 150 L.Ed.2d 239 (2001) ; State v. Sweeney , , 528 (La.
  • State v. Smith 181 So. 3d 111 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
  • State v. Mark 146 So. 3d 886 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    “To admit demonstrative evidence at trial, the law requires that the object be identified.”
  • State v. Martin 131 So. 3d 121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    art. 901(B)(10) provides for “[a]ny method of authentication or identification provided by Act of Congress or by Act of the Louisiana Legislature.” “To admit demonstrative evidence at trial, the law requires that the object be identified.”
  • State v. Moore 128 So. 3d 608 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Williams 119 So. 3d 131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    5 Cir. 1/16/07) , , writ denied, 07-371 (La.5/4/07), ().
  • State v. Trim 107 So. 3d 656 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Donnaud, supra.
  • State of Louisiana v. Vaschon S. Blount La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • State v. Johnson 78 So. 3d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    5 Cir. 1/16/07) , , writ denied, 07-371 (La.5/4/07)
  • State v. McElveen 73 So. 3d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Ferguson 54 So. 3d 152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Sanchez 39 So. 3d 834 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert Allen Snelling La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    Nevertheless, guilty knowledge, an essential component of any showing that a defendant has constructive possession of contraband, i.e., dominion and control over it although the contraband is not in his actual possession, may be inferred from the circumstances of the transaction.
  • State v. Snelling 36 So. 3d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Nevertheless, guilty knowledge, an essential component of any showing that a defendant has constructive possession of contraband, ie., dominion and control over it although the contraband is not in his actual possession, may be inferred from the circumstances of the transaction.
  • State v. Platt 998 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. Ezekiel Maurice McGinnis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. McGinnis 981 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Lewis 965 So. 2d 971 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Chambers 966 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    455 , 30 L.Ed.2d 468 (1971)
  • State v. King 951 So. 2d 384 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
  • State v. Guice 950 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    455 , 30 L.Ed.2d 468 (1971)
  • State v. Walker 947 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    455 , 30 L.Ed.2d 468 (1971)
  • State v. Sosa 948 So. 2d 236 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    State v. Donnaud, supra .
  • State v. Marshall 943 So. 2d 362 La. 2006
    art. 609.1(A), which governs attacks on a witness's general credibility ("In a criminal case, every witness by testifying subjects himself to examination relative to his criminal convictions."); ("Irrespective of its relevance to the present prosecution, a conviction per se historically is a relevant factor for the trier of fact's evaluation of a witness' credibility.").
  • State of Louisiana v. John Thompson, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    [G]uilty knowledge, an essential component of any showing that a defendant has constructive possession of contraband, i.e., dominion and control over it although the contraband is not in his actual possession, may be inferred from the circumstances of the transaction.
  • State v. Thompson 943 So. 2d 621 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    [G]uilty knowledge, an essential component of any showing that a defendant has constructive possession of contraband, i.e., dominion and control over it although the contraband is not in his actual possession, may be inferred from the circumstances of the transaction.
  • State v. Pigford 922 So. 2d 517 La. 2006
    Nevertheless, guilty knowledge, an essential component of any showing that a defendant has constructive possession of contraband, i.e., dominion and control over it although the contraband is not in his actual possession, may be inferred from the circumstances of the transaction.
  • State of Louisiana v. Paul Junius Felix La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    “The defendant must show prejudice before his conviction will be reversed.” Id., 19 (La.App.
  • State v. Felix 918 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Bajoie 899 So. 2d 78 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Hensley 900 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
  • State v. Donnaud 896 So. 2d 1151 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
  • State v. McGee 894 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
  • State v. Burbank 893 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
  • State v. Falkins 880 So. 2d 903 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    State v. Jones, 98-1055 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Ishmel Joel Ennis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Ennis 877 So. 2d 300 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
  • State of Louisiana v. William Odell Cash La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    6 cited by Defendant, merely contains general statements of law; which he also cites, is a pre-Jackson sufficiency case.
  • State v. Cash 861 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    cited by Defendant, merely contains general statements of law; which he also cites, is a pre- Jackson sufficiency case.
  • State v. Redditt 868 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    State v. Jones, 98-1055 (La.
  • State v. Royal 857 So. 2d 1167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    State v. Bradham, 94-71 (La.App.
  • State v. Taylor 841 So. 2d 894 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    State v. Bradham, 94-71 (La.App.
  • State v. Odle 834 So. 2d 483 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Prudhomme 819 So. 2d 443 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Bowie 813 So. 2d 377 La. 2002
    607(C),(D) (authorizing admission of intrinsic and extrinsic evidence to show bias, interest or corruption); -1063 (La.1985); -755 (La.1985); , 681 (La.1985); (La.
  • State v. Burbank 811 So. 2d 1112 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Brisban 809 So. 2d 923 La. 2002
  • State v. Brooks 807 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    State v. Kelson, 94-263 (La.App.
  • State v. Hansbro 796 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    State v. Toney, 26,711 (La.App.2d Cir.3/1/95)