Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sweeney, 443 So. 2d 522.

210 citing documents.

State v. Simon 544 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Martin 543 So. 2d 1020 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. French 538 So. 2d 1117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
The Louisiana Supreme Court, discussed the introduction of demonstrative evidence.
State v. Worthy 532 So. 2d 541 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Lewis 535 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Villavicencio 528 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
State v. Gale 526 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
State v. Yarls 527 So. 2d 385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Bruno 526 So. 2d 1287 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Richard 525 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Gardner 524 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Bryant 521 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
*496 the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the criteria for admitting evidence at trial.
State v. King 520 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Francosi 511 So. 2d 1181 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
the Court defined the standards for the admission of demonstrative evidence: To admit demonstrative evidence at trial, the law requires that the object be identified.
State v. Ancar 508 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Foster 510 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Vital 505 So. 2d 1006 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Smith, supra ; (La.
State v. Huber 504 So. 2d 644 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
at 528 (La.1983) in which the Court held that the law requires that the object be identified.
State v. Ourso 502 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Dotson, 260 La.
State v. O'NEAL 501 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Leonard 499 So. 2d 585 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Helaire 496 So. 2d 1322 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
State v. Viator 495 So. 2d 1341 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
State v. Roy 496 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Johnson 496 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
455 , 30 L.Ed.2d 468 (1971)
State v. Woods 494 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Colter 491 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Smith, supra; ” The sentence imposed does not appear to be “grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime” nor to be the “purposeless imposition of pain and suffering”.
State v. Johnson 492 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
. cited by the state in its brief, the Supreme Court determined that the cross-examination of a witness, who had been arrested by the same two officers who arrested and testified against defendant, as to the witness’ arrest was not within the prohibition of La.R.S.
State v. Vampran 491 So. 2d 1356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Clark 492 So. 2d 862 La. 1986
State v. Black 490 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Calamia 490 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
State v. Hayes 488 So. 2d 1287 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State v. Bell 488 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
: “To admit demonstrative evidence at trial, the law requires that the object be identified.
State v. Williams 486 So. 2d 889 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Pittman 486 So. 2d 895 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Cook 485 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Dorsey 484 So. 2d 865 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Lambertus 482 So. 2d 812 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
specifies: To admit demonstrative evidence at trial, the law requires that the object be identified.
State v. Young 480 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
The sentencing transcript in this case indicates that the Trial Judge complied with La.C.
State v. Johnston 480 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Carney 476 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
State v. Thompson 473 So. 2d 937 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Smith, [ ], supra
State v. Long 473 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Dotson, 260 La.
State v. Sepcich 473 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Martin 472 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Hamilton 470 So. 2d 604 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Hawkins 470 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. *442 Smith, supra
State v. Rankin 465 So. 2d 679 La. 1985
3A Wigmore, Evidence § 944 (Chadbourn rev. 1970).
State v. Wallace 466 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985