Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Green, 443 So. 2d 531.

20 citing documents.

State v. Hankton 140 So. 3d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
(“[b]efore a confession or inculpatory statement can be introduced into evidence, the state has the burden of proving affirmatively, beyond a reasonable doubt, that it was free and voluntary, and not made under the influence of fear, duress, menaces, threats, inducements, or promises”) (citations omitte
State v. Blank 955 So. 2d 90 La. 2007
State v. Hawkins 669 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Davis 666 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
State v. Hattaway 621 So. 2d 796 La. 1993
State v. Bennett 617 So. 2d 550 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
which discusses the admissibility of other crimes evidence on a tape recording which contained an inculpatory statement.
State v. Frederick 554 So. 2d 1288 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Hollingsworth 550 So. 2d 663 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Allen 526 So. 2d 1198 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Sheehan 515 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
15:451; State v. Thompson, supra
State v. Counterman 515 So. 2d 533 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Succession of Smith v. Kavanaugh, Pierson & Talley 513 So. 2d 1138 La. 1987
Broussard v. State Farm Mut.
State v. Brown 486 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Allen 478 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
*593 the Supreme Court noted further that the "trial court's conclusion about the admissibility of a confession will not be disturbed if supported by the evidence,"
State v. Sepcich 473 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Hardeman 467 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Miranda v. Arizona, supra
State v. Brumfield 464 So. 2d 1061 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Sutton 460 So. 2d 1087 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
unless the "other crimes” are interrelated with the crime for which the defendant is on trial.
State v. James 459 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Thomas 447 So. 2d 1053 La. 1984