Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Davenport, 445 So. 2d 1190.

61 citing documents.

State v. Munson 115 So. 3d 6 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Scie 83 So. 3d 1082 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Kroner 10 So. 3d 1231 La. 2009
(“[R]elevant evidence means evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence.”).
State v. Parker 11 So. 3d 534 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Wiley 880 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
[26] See State v. Mitchell supra
State v. Amin 839 So. 2d 262 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), , citing, (La.
State v. Guillory 773 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
State v. Mitchell 772 So. 2d 78 La. 2000
State v. Harper 754 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Talley 748 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Adams 715 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
However, in which officers executing an arrest warrant over one year after the offense found the defendant hiding in a closet.
State v. Henry 709 So. 2d 322 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
State v. Allen 677 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Hampton 670 So. 2d 1349 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Badon 664 So. 2d 1291 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
State v. Bordenave 660 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
State v. Coleman 647 So. 2d 1355 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Bourque 622 So. 2d 198 La. 1993
(special charge unnecessary where this definition was correct statement of law in general charge).
State v. Dukes 609 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Major 604 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Jackson 582 So. 2d 915 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Harris 577 So. 2d 220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Thompson 578 So. 2d 1151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. O'Banion 570 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Mayeaux 570 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
State v. Alpaugh 568 So. 2d 1379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Lewis 567 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Brown 556 So. 2d 248 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Thompson 544 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Cornelius 539 So. 2d 919 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Restrepo 538 So. 2d 1130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Sims 529 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Carr 530 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. McLean 525 So. 2d 1251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Hodges 526 So. 2d 406 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
State v. Morris 521 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Robertson 516 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Williams 513 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Caldwell 504 So. 2d 853 La. 1987
State v. Batista 496 So. 2d 1165 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Alphonso 496 So. 2d 1113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
The standard of relevance in Louisiana is based on logic and experience, in applying the definition of relevant evidence provided in La.R.S.
State v. Guirlando 491 So. 2d 38 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Walker 489 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Lopez 484 So. 2d 217 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Williams 483 So. 2d 1213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Doolittle 482 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Jackson 482 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Cross 482 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Johnson 480 So. 2d 878 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
the court considered whether a mistrial 6 was mandated under LSA-R.S.
State v. London 478 So. 2d 1340 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985