DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Wright, 445 So. 2d 1198.

560 citing documents.

  • State v. Kirsch 488 So. 2d 1295 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979) a conviction must be based on proof sufficient for any rational trier of fact, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, to find the essential elements of the crime charged beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State v. McGuffey 486 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Sutton 485 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.App.
  • State v. Taylor 485 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Garcia 483 So. 2d 953 La. 1986
  • State v. Williams 483 So. 2d 1213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Fluitt 482 So. 2d 906 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Barberousse 480 So. 2d 273 La. 1985
  • State v. Desdunes 477 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    2781, 2789 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Holbrook 476 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Benoit 477 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
    the Supreme Court enunciated the following standard as appropriate for use by appellate courts when reviewing the sufficiency of evidence: The constitutional standard for testing the sufficiency of evidence, enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Bruce 477 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
    Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.C.
  • State v. McFadden 476 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    State v. Chism, supra; (La.
  • State v. Rosiere 476 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Campbell 474 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    the court does not determine whether another possible hypothesis has been suggested by defendant which could explain the events in an exculpatory fashion.
  • State v. Robbins 471 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Bruce 472 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Peters 468 So. 2d 1342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Porretto 468 So. 2d 1142 La. 1985
  • State v. Williams 470 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Torres 470 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
    ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NO. 2 (La.
  • State v. Harriman 469 So. 2d 298 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    as follows: The constitutional standard for testing the sufficiency of evidence, enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Milton 469 So. 2d 309 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Hart 467 So. 2d 1366 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
    the Supreme Court of Louisiana, citing Jackson and R.S.
  • State v. Square 468 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Hardeman 467 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Wade 467 So. 2d 1191 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Johnson 466 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Smith 470 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Necaise 466 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
    the Supreme Court set forth the following standard for reviewing sufficiency of evidence on appeal: The constitutional standard for testing the sufficiency of evidence, enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Accardo 466 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
    the Supreme Court set forth the following standard for use by appellate courts when reviewing evidence: The constitutional standard for testing the sufficiency of evidence, enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Chairs 466 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
    the Supreme Court at page 1201 set forth the following guidelines: "...
  • State v. Raynal 466 So. 2d 601 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    Under the standard set forth in Jackson v. Virginia, infra, we find the evidence was sufficient for the trial court to conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant was operating his vehicle at the time of the accident.
  • State v. Cook 465 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    The standard of appellate review in a as follows: The constitutional standard for testing the sufficiency of evidence, ennunciated in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Williams 464 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), a conviction must be based on proof sufficient for any rational trier of fact, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, to find the essential elements of the crime charged beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State v. Daley 463 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    : "The constitutional standard for testing the sufficiency of evidence, enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Landry 463 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
    explains how Jackson and LSA-R.S.
  • State v. Aitch 465 So. 2d 27 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Sennette 462 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Broaden 461 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Smith 461 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Eason 460 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Williams 460 So. 2d 2 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Ester 458 So. 2d 1357 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Crawford 458 So. 2d 518 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Credit 455 So. 2d 1238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. McKinney 455 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.App.
  • State v. McLeland 456 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Roberson 454 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Malonson 454 So. 2d 371 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    15:438 also requires: “Assuming every fact to be proved that the evidence tends to prove, in order to convict, it must exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence.” states that R.S.