Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Wright, 445 So. 2d 1198.

560 citing documents.

State v. Hayes 70 So. 3d 27 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Payton 68 So. 3d 594 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. McMillian 65 So. 3d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Brown 56 So. 3d 1095 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Fernandez 50 So. 3d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
15:438 merely “provides an evidentiary guideline for the jury when considering circumstantial evidence and facilitates appellate review of whether a rational *226 juror could have found defendant guilty 1 nbeyond a reasonable doubt.”
State of Louisiana v. Lawrence Kivin Nixon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Greene 26 So. 3d 274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
15:438 merely “provides an evi-dentiary guideline for the jury when considering circumstantial evidence and facilitates appellate review of whether a rational juror could have found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.”
State v. Favors 28 So. 3d 433 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Johnson 22 So. 3d 205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Dowell 17 So. 3d 523 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
State v. QUAC TRAN 18 So. 3d 165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
15:438 merely “provides an evi-dentiary guideline for the jury when considering circumstantial evidence and facilitates appellate review of whether a rational juror could have found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.”
State v. Holland 13 So. 3d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Riley 10 So. 3d 1232 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
State v. Fields 10 So. 3d 350 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Brown 7 So. 3d 1238 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
State v. Vincent 7 So. 3d 1243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Lawrence 5 So. 3d 896 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Sparkman 5 So. 3d 891 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
State v. Brown 3 So. 3d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Addison, 94-2431 (La.App.
State v. Vice 997 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State of Louisiana v. Billy Ray Vice La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Kestle 996 So. 2d 275 La. 2008
State v. Boyd 999 So. 2d 40 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
State v. Durham 996 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Conner 996 So. 2d 564 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
State v. Castell 991 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
State v. Agee 990 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
State v. Jackson 987 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Shaw 987 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
State v. Forbs 983 So. 2d 954 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Simmons 983 So. 2d 200 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
State of Louisiana v. Gary Lafleur La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. LaFleur 977 So. 2d 311 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Williams 977 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
State v. Lopez 971 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
State v. Davis 958 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
State of Louisiana v. Clayton James Greene La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
the defendant argued he was deprived of his right to a fair trial because of the long hours of testimony during the two-day trial and the retirement of the jury at 11:00 p.m.
State v. Allen 954 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
State v. Dunbar 950 So. 2d 872 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
State v. Love 947 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
State v. Smith 946 So. 2d 218 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
State v. Cuccia 933 So. 2d 134 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
State of Louisiana v. Dawn R. Hargrave La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Hargrave 926 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Phillips 905 So. 2d 337 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
State v. Clark 904 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
State v. Hughes 900 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
State v. Sykes 900 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
State of Louisiana v. Robert T. Dotson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Dotson 896 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005