Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Trosclair, 443 So. 2d 1098.

127 citing documents.

  • State v. Easley 517 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • Schwamb v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. 516 So. 2d 452 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Heath 513 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    State v. Huizar, supra, at 750 ; cert.
  • State v. Evans 512 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Reed 512 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. O'Pry 511 So. 2d 87 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Harris 510 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Ancar 508 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Kyzar 509 So. 2d 147 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Breckenridge 506 So. 2d 799 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    cert, dismissed, 468 U.S. 1205 , 104 S.Ct.
  • State v. Howard 505 So. 2d 228 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Mills 505 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Thomas 504 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Mims 501 So. 2d 962 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    While it is not necessary, in these circumstances, for us to consider whether the trial court abused its great discretion in ruling on the competence of the expert to testify ( (La.
  • State v. Barbre 499 So. 2d 1324 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Deboue 496 So. 2d 394 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Farris 491 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    our Supreme Court held: "[I]t is not our function to assess credibility or reweigh the evidence.
  • State v. Guirlando 491 So. 2d 38 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    2211 , 72 L.Ed.2d 652 (1982); (La.App.
  • State v. Rosiere 488 So. 2d 965 La. 1986
  • State v. Coleman 486 So. 2d 995 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Berkley 482 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Hookfin 476 So. 2d 481 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Payne 461 So. 2d 1151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    the court held: “The defendant claims, however, that a guilty verdict could not properly be founded upon the testimony of these witnesses as their credibility was destroyed.
  • State v. Porter 454 So. 2d 220 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
    : " The defendant claims, however, that a guilty verdict could not properly be founded upon the testimony of these witnesses as their credibility was destroyed.
  • State v. Matthews 450 So. 2d 644 La. 1984
  • State v. White 450 So. 2d 648 La. 1984
  • State v. Watson 449 So. 2d 1321 La. 1984