Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Soco, 441 So. 2d 719.

234 citing documents.

State v. Gray 502 So. 2d 1114 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Baker 499 So. 2d 338 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Johnson 492 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Barnes 491 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
State v. Hernandez 489 So. 2d 1053 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Dondis 488 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
State v. Isaac 487 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Dye 486 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Lee 482 So. 2d 194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Williams 482 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
The defendants argue that the harsh sentences in this case were unwarranted due to the fact that maximum sentences are generally reserved for the “worst offenders committing the worst sort of crime.”
State v. Malanez 482 So. 2d 100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
The Louisiana Supreme Court has stated that “the defendant’s credibility is not necessarily a relevant factor for determining the proper sentence and certainly not sufficient to justify the maximum sentence.”
State v. Mitchell 480 So. 2d 388 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Caston 477 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
State v. Johnston 476 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Wright 476 So. 2d 451 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Burgess 475 So. 2d 35 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Jones 473 So. 2d 917 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
the Louisiana Supreme Court granted such relief by ordering that on remand for resentencing a judge other than the original sentencing judge do the resentenc-ing.
State v. Lawson 474 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
State v. Adams 471 So. 2d 298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Dixon 471 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
State v. McGhee 469 So. 2d 1051 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Wilkins 468 So. 2d 1351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Williams 467 So. 2d 1293 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
State v. Hayes 466 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Johnson 464 So. 2d 1049 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Rovaris 464 So. 2d 958 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
State v. Santee 464 So. 2d 922 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
State v. Toomer 461 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
the court found that a similar sentencing procedure was not adequate to comply with Art. 894.1 and specifically that defendant's credibility while testifying in his behalf is not necessarily a relevant factor for determining the proper sentence.
State v. Collins 461 So. 2d 384 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Casimier 454 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Williams 454 So. 2d 295 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Nelson 449 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Jack 448 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
State v. Davis 448 So. 2d 645 La. 1984