Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Davis, 449 So. 2d 452.

139 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Cedrick Stroughter La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Victor J. Demery La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Jaiden Kephart La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana Versus Noe A. Aguliar-Benitez AKA Noe Aguilar-Benitez La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana Versus Shawn Michael McKinney La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
A sentence is unconstitutionally excessive “if it makes no measurable contribution to acceptable goals of punishment and is nothing more than the purposeless imposition of pain and suffering and is grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime.” (La.
State of Louisiana v. Brandon R. Laurant La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
A sentence is constitutionally excessive if “it makes no measurable contribution to acceptable goals of punishment and is nothing more than the purposeless imposition of pain and suffering and is grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime.” (La.
State v. Arceneaux 271 So. 3d 362 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Davis , , 453 (La.
State v. Priest 265 So. 3d 993 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Davis , , 453 (La.
State v. Dixon 241 So. 3d 514 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Davis , , 453 (La.
State v. Dove 194 So. 3d 92 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
A sentence is constitutionally .excessive if “it makes no measurable contribution to acceptable goals of punishment and is nothing more than the purposeless imposition of pain and suffering and is grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime.”
State v. Norah 131 So. 3d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
A sentence is constitutionally excessive if “it makes no measurable contribution to acceptable goals of punishment and is nothing more than the purposeless imposition of pain Island suffering and is grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime.”
State v. Hamdalla 126 So. 3d 619 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
A sentence is constitutionally excessive if “it makes no measurable contribution to acceptable goals of punishment and is nothing more than the purposeless imposition of pain and suffering and is grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime.”
State v. Jackson 92 So. 3d 1243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Davis, supra [ ]; (La.App.
State ex rel. D.G. 11 So. 3d 548 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State Ex Rel. Dg 11 So. 3d 548 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
State v. Mitchell 956 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Franklin, 31,068 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. David Lee Leger La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Leger 907 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State of Louisiana v. David Wayne Wilturner La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
-54 (La.1984), the supreme court noted, The trial court’s reasons in imposing sentence, as required by La.C.Cr.
State v. Wilturner 858 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
-54 (La.1984), the supreme court noted, The trial court's reasons in imposing sentence, as required by La.C.Cr.
State v. Rogers 812 So. 2d 809 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
The State argues that the sentence should not be set aside as excessive absent a showing of an abuse of the broad sentencing discretion granted the trial court, (La.
State v. Badeaux 798 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
STATE of Louisiana v. MORRISON 758 So. 2d 283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Morrison 758 So. 2d 283 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
State v. Perkins 751 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Williams 729 So. 2d 14 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Coco 723 So. 2d 513 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Daigle 688 So. 2d 158 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
State v. Lewis 688 So. 2d 92 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Singleton 680 So. 2d 88 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
State v. Alberto 665 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
State v. Frank 652 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
State v. Wright 650 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
State v. Guidry 647 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
State v. Boros 646 So. 2d 1183 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
State v. Slang 646 So. 2d 1037 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
State v. Jones 645 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
State v. Martin 638 So. 2d 411 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
State v. Kennedy 631 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
State v. Hill 628 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Conrad 620 So. 2d 366 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
State v. DeSalvo 620 So. 2d 382 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Payne 612 So. 2d 153 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
State v. Smith 610 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
State v. Mitchell 598 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Jackson 597 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
State v. Carson 598 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Ventress 578 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
State v. Robinson 573 So. 2d 1210 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. Delaune 572 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by