Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lathers, 444 So. 2d 96.

69 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Ashton Dean Biggs La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
    The supreme court has previously stated that a “maximum penalty ‘is ordinarily reserved only for the worst kind of offense and the worst kind of offender….’”
  • State of Louisiana v. Toby James Fruge 179 So. 3d 579 La. 2015
  • State v. Hamdalla 126 So. 3d 619 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State of Louisiana v. Jeffery Lee Guillory La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • State v. Guillory 61 So. 3d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State of Louisiana v. Clifford Gail Holloway, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    ( for the 4 premise “the maximum penalty ‘is ordinarily reserved only for the worst kind of offense and the worst kind of offender.’”).
  • State of Louisiana v. Robin Leblanc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    the defendant was charged with aggravated rape and found guilty of the responsive verdict of forcible rape.
  • State v. Seals 923 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    in which the Louisiana Supreme Court held that a sentence, although within the statutory limits, may be extreme and, therefore, violative of the defendant’s constitutional rights against excessiveness.
  • State v. Cook 742 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
  • State v. Adkins 721 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    State v. Delaughter, 29,974 (La.App.
  • State v. Hardy 715 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Richmond 708 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Carrier 670 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Slater 655 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Cook 598 So. 2d 481 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
  • State v. Wright 593 So. 2d 759 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
    Regarding (1), wherein the defendant's 40-year hard labor sentence for forcible rape, to be served without parole, probation or suspension of sentence, was found excessive by the Supreme Court of Louisiana because the accused was young (20 years of age at time of the crime), a first offender, had a regular job and was fin
  • State v. Wry 591 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Grillette 588 So. 2d 1338 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Driggers 582 So. 2d 369 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
    Although maximum sentences should be imposed on the worst offenders as a general rule, the sentences imposed do not shock our sense of justice and are not purposeless.
  • State v. Walker 573 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Calton 573 So. 2d 635 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Anderson 574 So. 2d 468 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Boyte 571 So. 2d 722 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
  • State v. Cathey 569 So. 2d 627 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
  • State v. Crabtree 569 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
  • State v. Weidert 568 So. 2d 1162 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
  • State v. Lewis 566 So. 2d 1120 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
  • State v. Lamb 566 So. 2d 462 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
  • State v. Wilson 561 So. 2d 889 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
  • State v. Allen 557 So. 2d 1124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • State v. Solomon 549 So. 2d 938 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
    appeal after remand, (La.App.
  • State v. Rodriguez 550 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Davis 550 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Mims 550 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Armstead 542 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
  • State v. Melancon 536 So. 2d 430 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
  • State v. Harris 535 So. 2d 1131 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Madison 535 So. 2d 1024 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    State v. Williams, 454 So.
  • State v. Lloyd 535 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    State v. Williams, 454 So.
  • State v. Bouie 532 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Neal 535 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Lee 524 So. 2d 1176 La. 1988
    Const. art. I, § 20; La.Supreme Court Rule XXVIII; (La.
  • State v. Davis 528 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    State v. Williams, 454 So.
  • State v. Klause 525 So. 2d 1076 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    appeal after remand, (La.App.
  • State v. Klause 525 So. 2d 1076 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    appeal after remand, (La.App.
  • State v. Simon 520 So. 2d 1044 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
    appeal after remand, (La.App.
  • State v. Thompson 516 So. 2d 349 La. 1987
    Const. art. I, § 20; La.Supreme Court Rule XXVIII; and other authorities.
  • State v. Wright 513 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Lamothe 511 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    State v. Brumfield, 496 So.
  • State v. Robinson 511 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    appeal after remand, (La.App.