Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Belton, 441 So. 2d 1195.

488 citing documents.

  • State v. Ellington 680 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Page 680 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    293 , 83 L.Ed.2d 228 (1984); cert.
  • State v. Burns 675 So. 2d 1233 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    293 , 83 L.Ed.2d 228 (1984); cert.
  • State v. Hebert 676 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Lavigne 675 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Randolph 674 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    4 Cir.1991) [trespass of an abandoned dwelling]; [drugs].
  • State v. Nelson 674 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • State v. Nixon 672 So. 2d 402 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    cert, denied, 466 U.S. 953 , 104 S.Ct.
  • State v. Wesley 671 So. 2d 1257 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); cert.
  • State v. Stevens 672 So. 2d 986 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Phillips 670 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Hebert 669 So. 2d 499 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Fort 670 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • State v. Miskel 668 So. 2d 1299 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Short 668 So. 2d 1240 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
    cert denied, 466 U.S. 953 , 104 S.Ct.
  • State v. Charles 666 So. 2d 1147 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Ferrand 664 So. 2d 396 La. 1995
  • State v. Senegal 664 So. 2d 832 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Williams 665 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Livings 664 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Johnson 660 So. 2d 942 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
  • State v. White 660 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Wilson 657 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Jones 657 So. 2d 262 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Jones 657 So. 2d 261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • State v. Owens 655 So. 2d 603 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    690 , 66 L.Ed.2d 621 (1981)
  • State v. Matthews 654 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Williams 655 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
    1547 , 113 L.Ed.2d 690 (1991), stated at pages 712 and 713: “In Belton we found an individual is ‘seized’ within the meaning of La.
  • Taylor v. City of Shreveport 653 So. 2d 232 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Hall 652 So. 2d 1086 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Johnson 649 So. 2d 1076 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • State v. Smith 649 So. 2d 1078 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Cormier 649 So. 2d 528 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
  • State v. Martin 643 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Jackson 641 So. 2d 1081 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
  • State v. Jackson 641 So. 2d 1081 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
  • State v. Williams 641 So. 2d 647 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    Furthermore, if “property is abandoned without any prior unlawful intrusion into a citizen’s right to be free from government interference, then such property may be lawfully seized.” cert.
  • State v. Thomas 638 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    Thus, the Louisiana Supreme Court has held that an individual is “seized” within the meaning of Article 1, Section 5 when the individual is either “actually stopped” or when an “actual stop” of the individual is “imminent.” cert, denied, 466 U.S. 953 , 104 S.Ct.
  • State v. Davis 637 So. 2d 1012 La. 1994
    1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); cert.
  • State v. Collins 637 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • State v. Ortiz 637 So. 2d 1134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    certiorari denied, Belton v. Louisiana, 466 U.S. 953 , 104 S.Ct.
  • State v. Daniels 634 So. 2d 962 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
    1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); cert.
  • State v. Solomon 634 So. 2d 1330 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
  • State v. Vance 633 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    State v. Belton, [ cert.
  • State v. Burton 640 So. 2d 342 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
  • State v. Hartzheim 633 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
    1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); cert.
  • State v. Alexander 632 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    “The totality of the circumstances, ‘the whole picture,’ must be considered in determining whether reasonable cause exists.” cert.
  • State v. Skipper 632 So. 2d 857 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • State v. Finne 632 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Britton 633 So. 2d 1208 La. 1994